mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Challenges in Annotating Datasets to Quantify Bias in Under-represented Society

arXiv 2309.08624 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, including the development of highly sophisticated large language models (LLM), have proven beneficial in many real-world applications. However, evidence of inherent bias encoded in these LLMs has raised concerns about equity. In response, there has been an increase in research dealing with bias, including studies focusing on quantifying bias and developing debiasing techniques. Benchmark bias datasets have also been developed for binary gender classification and ethical/racial considerations, focusing predominantly on American demographics. However, there is minimal research in understanding and quantifying bias related to under-represented societies. Motivated by the lack of annotated datasets for quantifying bias in under-represented societies, we endeavoured to create benchmark datasets for the New Zealand (NZ) population. We faced many challenges in this process, despite the availability of three annotators. This research outlines the manual annotation process, provides an overview of the challenges we encountered and lessons learnt, and presents recommendations for future research.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2023.

Builds on

24 of 45 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  4. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  5. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
  8. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
  9. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 541
  10. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 412
  11. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
  12. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
12 more
  1. 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
  2. 2022"I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Datasetcited by 162
  3. 2020UnQovering Stereotyping Biases via Underspecified Questionscited by 126
  4. 2019On Measuring and Mitigating Biased Inferences of Word Embeddingscited by 112
  5. 2021An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 97
  6. 2021Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detectioncited by 96
  7. 2020Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classificationcited by 80
  8. 2020OSCaR: Orthogonal Subspace Correction and Rectification of Biases in Word Embeddingscited by 40
  9. 2022Towards Identifying Social Bias in Dialog Systems: Frame, Datasets, and Benchmarkscited by 36
  10. 2019Towards Understanding Gender Bias in Relation Extractioncited by 23
  11. 2022Fair and Argumentative Language Modeling for Computational Argumentationcited by 18
  12. 2023Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques: An Indigenous Qualitative Analysiscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.