mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do the Frankenstein, or how to achieve better out-of-distribution performance with manifold mixing model soup

arXiv 2309.08610 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard recipe applied in transfer learning is to finetune a pretrained model on the task-specific dataset with different hyperparameter settings and pick the model with the highest accuracy on the validation dataset. Unfortunately, this leads to models which do not perform well under distribution shifts, e.g. when the model is given graphical sketches of the object as input instead of photos. In order to address this, we propose the manifold mixing model soup, an algorithm which mixes together the latent space manifolds of multiple finetuned models in an optimal way in order to generate a fused model. We show that the fused model gives significantly better out-of-distribution performance (+3.5 % compared to best individual model) when finetuning a CLIP model for image classification. In addition, it provides also better accuracy on the original dataset where the finetuning has been done.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 17 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  3. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  4. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  5. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  6. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  7. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  8. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  9. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  10. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  11. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 621
  12. 2020Neural networks with late-phase weightscited by 29
2 more
  1. 2023PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA)cited by 23
  2. 2020Versatile Black-Box Optimizationcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.