Text Classification of Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic identification of clinical trials for which a patient is eligible is complicated by the fact that trial eligibility is stated in natural language. A potential solution to this problem is to employ text classification methods for common types of eligibility criteria. In this study, we focus on seven common exclusion criteria in cancer trials: prior malignancy, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, psychiatric illness, drug/substance abuse, and autoimmune illness. Our dataset consists of 764 phase III cancer trials with these exclusions annotated at the trial level. We experiment with common transformer models as well as a new pre-trained clinical trial BERT model. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of automatically classifying common exclusion criteria. Additionally, we demonstrate the value of a pre-trained language model specifically for clinical trials, which yields the highest average performance across all criteria.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2023.
Builds on
8 of 47 references.
References · 8
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
- 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
- 2020Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 1,009
- 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 1,002
- 2019Transfer Learning in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: An Evaluation of BERT and ELMo on Ten Benchmarking Datasetscited by 299
- 2018Clinical Text Classification with Rule-based Features and Knowledge-guided Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2019Comprehend Medical: a Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction Web Servicecited by 10
- 2022The Leaf Clinical Trials Corpus: a new resource for query generation from clinical trial eligibility criteriacited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Towards Resilient and Efficient LLMs: A Comparative Study of Efficiency, Performance, and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 22
- 2024Efficiency optimization of large-scale language models based on deep learning in natural language processing taskscited by 14
- 2024Predicting 30-Day Hospital Readmission in Medicare Patients: Insights from an LSTM Deep Learning Modelcited by 8
- 2024Exploring the Generalization of Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Classifiers Across Diseasescited by 3
- 2024Using Large Language Models to Generate Clinical Trial Tables and Figurescited by 3
- 2025Natural Language Processing in Support of Evidence-based Medicine: A Scoping Reviewcited by 2
- 2025A systematic review of trial-matching pipelines using large language modelscited by 0
- 2025A systematic review of trial-matching pipelines using large language models13 Sep 2025
- 2025Natural Language Processing in Support of Evidence-based Medicine: A Scoping Review28 May 2025
- 2024Predicting 30-Day Hospital Readmission in Medicare Patients: Insights from an LSTM Deep Learning Model23 Oct 2024
- 2024Using Large Language Models to Generate Clinical Trial Tables and Figures18 Sep 2024
- 2024Towards Resilient and Efficient LLMs: A Comparative Study of Efficiency, Performance, and Adversarial Robustness8 Aug 2024
- 2024Efficiency optimization of large-scale language models based on deep learning in natural language processing tasks20 May 2024
- 2024Exploring the Generalization of Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Classifiers Across Diseases25 Mar 2024