STUPD: A Synthetic Dataset for Spatial and Temporal Relation Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding relations between objects is crucial for understanding the semantics of a visual scene. It is also an essential step in order to bridge visual and language models. However, current state-of-the-art computer vision models still lack the ability to perform spatial reasoning well. Existing datasets mostly cover a relatively small number of spatial relations, all of which are static relations that do not intrinsically involve motion. In this paper, we propose the Spatial and Temporal Understanding of Prepositions Dataset (STUPD) -- a large-scale video dataset for understanding static and dynamic spatial relationships derived from prepositions of the English language. The dataset contains 150K visual depictions (videos and images), consisting of 30 distinct spatial prepositional senses, in the form of object interaction simulations generated synthetically using Unity3D. In addition to spatial relations, we also propose 50K visual depictions across 10 temporal relations, consisting of videos depicting event/time-point interactions. To our knowledge, no dataset exists that represents temporal relations through visual settings. In this dataset, we also provide 3D information about object interactions such as frame-wise coordinates, and descriptions of the objects used. The goal of this synthetic dataset is to help models perform better in visual relationship detection in real-world settings. We demonstrate an increase in the performance of various models over 2 real-world datasets (ImageNet-VidVRD and Spatial Senses) when pretrained on the STUPD dataset, in comparison to other pretraining datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 37 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.
Builds on
37 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2022Visual Spatial Reasoning30 Apr
Other references · 36
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
- 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
- 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
- 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
- 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
24 more
- 2021NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actionscited by 735
- 2016Hollywood in Homes: Crowdsourcing Data Collection for Activity Understandingcited by 535
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
- 2017Scene Graph Generation by Iterative Message Passingcited by 462
- 2016Visual Relationship Detection with Language Priorscited by 333
- 2018Image Generation from Scene Graphscited by 324
- 2019Action Genome: Actions as Composition of Spatio-temporal Scene Graphscited by 249
- 2021iGibson 2.0: Object-Centric Simulation for Robot Learning of Everyday Household Taskscited by 191
- 2020Dense Regression Network for Video Groundingcited by 176
- 2019CATER: A diagnostic dataset for Compositional Actions and TEmporal Reasoningcited by 137
- 2017Visual Translation Embedding Network for Visual Relation Detectioncited by 112
- 2017Detecting Visual Relationships with Deep Relational Networkscited by 97
- 2019Specifying Object Attributes and Relations in Interactive Scene Generationcited by 76
- 2021Learning to Compose Visual Relationscited by 72
- 2022Testing Relational Understanding in Text-Guided Image Generationcited by 59
- 2022Fine-Grained Scene Graph Generation with Data Transfercited by 57
- 2019SpatialSense: An Adversarially Crowdsourced Benchmark for Spatial Relation Recognitioncited by 55
- 2021Unity Perception: Generate Synthetic Data for Computer Visioncited by 43
- 2021PTR: A Benchmark for Part-based Conceptual, Relational, and Physical Reasoningcited by 34
- 2020Rel3D: A Minimally Contrastive Benchmark for Grounding Spatial Relations in 3Dcited by 30
- 2017PPR-FCN: Weakly Supervised Visual Relation Detection via Parallel Pairwise R-FCNcited by 25
- 2022End-to-End Modeling via Information Tree for One-Shot Natural Language Spatial Video Groundingcited by 19
- 2017ViP-CNN: Visual Phrase Guided Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 8
- 2021The Preposition Projectcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SURPRISE3D: A Dataset for Spatial Understanding and Reasoning in Complex 3D Scenes
- 2025Spatial Understanding from Videos: Structured Prompts Meet Simulation Data
- 2024GSR-BENCH: A Benchmark for Grounded Spatial Reasoning Evaluation via Multimodal LLMs
- 2024Grounding Spatial Relations in Text-Only Language Models
- 2024Coarse Correspondences Boost Spatial-Temporal Reasoning in Multimodal Language Model
- 2024RelationVLM: Making Large Vision-Language Models Understand Visual Relations
- 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning
- 2025VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models