Verifiable Reinforcement Learning Systems via Compositionality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a framework for verifiable and compositional reinforcement learning (RL) in which a collection of RL subsystems, each of which learns to accomplish a separate subtask, are composed to achieve an overall task. The framework consists of a high-level model, represented as a parametric Markov decision process, which is used to plan and analyze compositions of subsystems, and of the collection of low-level subsystems themselves. The subsystems are implemented as deep RL agents operating under partial observability. By defining interfaces between the subsystems, the framework enables automatic decompositions of task specifications, e.g., reach a target set of states with a probability of at least 0.95, into individual subtask specifications, i.e. achieve the subsystem's exit conditions with at least some minimum probability, given that its entry conditions are met. This in turn allows for the independent training and testing of the subsystems. We present theoretical results guaranteeing that if each subsystem learns a policy satisfying its subtask specification, then their composition is guaranteed to satisfy the overall task specification. Conversely, if the subtask specifications cannot all be satisfied by the learned policies, we present a method, formulated as the problem of finding an optimal set of parameters in the high-level model, to automatically update the subtask specifications to account for the observed shortcomings. The result is an iterative procedure for defining subtask specifications, and for training the subsystems to meet them. Experimental results demonstrate the presented framework's novel capabilities in environments with both full and partial observability, discrete and continuous state and action spaces, as well as deterministic and stochastic dynamics.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2023.
Builds on
15 of 37 references.
References · 15
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 455
- 2017FeUdal Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2016Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 286
- 2018Unity: A General Platform for Intelligent Agentscited by 236
- 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 191
- 2018Omega-Regular Objectives in Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
- 2017Environment-Independent Task Specifications via GLTLcited by 67
- 2019Joint Inference of Reward Machines and Policies for Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
- 2020Reward Machines for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
- 2020Induction and Exploitation of Subgoal Automata for Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2020SPOTTER: Extending Symbolic Planning Operators through Targeted Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
3 more
- 2019Parameter Synthesis for Markov Models: Covering the Parameter Spacecited by 14
- 2021Verifiable and Compositional Reinforcement Learning Systemscited by 13
- 2018Synthesis in pMDPs: A Tale of 1001 Parameterscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Compositional shield synthesis for safe reinforcement learning in partial observabilitycited by 2
- 2025VeRecycle: Reclaiming Guarantees from Probabilistic Certificates for Stochastic Dynamical Systems after Changecited by 0
- 2025Automating the Refinement of Reinforcement Learning Specificationscited by 0
- 2025Automating the Refinement of Reinforcement Learning Specifications30 Nov 2025
- 2025Compositional shield synthesis for safe reinforcement learning in partial observability15 Sep 2025
- 2025VeRecycle: Reclaiming Guarantees from Probabilistic Certificates for Stochastic Dynamical Systems after Change20 May 2025