Hi Model, generating 'nice' instead of 'good' is not as bad as generating 'rice'! Towards Context and Semantic Infused Dialogue Generation Loss Function and Evaluation Metric
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past two decades, dialogue modeling has made significant strides, moving from simple rule-based responses to personalized and persuasive response generation. However, despite these advancements, the objective functions and evaluation metrics for dialogue generation have remained stagnant. These lexical-based metrics, e.g., cross-entropy and BLEU, have two key limitations: (a) word-to-word matching without semantic consideration: It assigns the same credit for failure to generate "nice" and "rice" for "good", (b) missing context attribute for evaluating the generated response: Even if a generated response is relevant to the ongoing dialogue context, it may still be penalized for not matching the gold utterance provided in the corpus. In this paper, we first investigate these limitations comprehensively and propose a new loss function called Semantic Infused Contextualized diaLogue (SemTextualLogue) loss function. We also formulate an evaluation metric called Dialuation, incorporating both context and semantic relevance. We experimented with both non-pretrained and pre-trained models on two dialogue corpora, encompassing task-oriented and open-domain scenarios. We found that the dialogue generation models trained with SemTextualLogueloss attained superior performance compared to the traditional cross-entropy loss function. The findings establish that the effective training of a dialogue generation model hinges significantly on incorporating semantics and context. This pattern is also mirrored in the introduced Dialuation metric, where the consideration of both context and semantics correlates more strongly with human evaluation compared to traditional metrics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2023.
Builds on
19 of 35 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
- 2015Building End-To-End Dialogue Systems Using Generative Hierarchical Neural Network Modelscited by 207
- 2020MultiWOZ 2.2 : A Dialogue Dataset with Additional Annotation Corrections and State Tracking Baselinescited by 201
- 2017A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 162
- 2021Recent Advances in Deep Learning Based Dialogue Systems: A Systematic Surveycited by 130
- 2020Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 107
- 2017Adversarial Learning for Neural Dialogue Generationcited by 103
7 more
- 2021A Survey on Dialogue Summarization: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 51
- 2018Neural Abstractive Text Summarization with Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 39
- 2019Improving Neural Response Diversity with Frequency-Aware Cross-Entropy Losscited by 29
- 2021Diversifying Dialog Generation via Adaptive Label Smoothingcited by 25
- 2020Evaluating Dialogue Generation Systems via Response Selectioncited by 9
- 2018Another Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Dialogue Generationcited by 3
- 2021Improving Computer Generated Dialog with Auxiliary Loss Functions and Custom Evaluation Metricscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.