mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FaNS: a Facet-based Narrative Similarity Metric

arXiv 2309.04823 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Similar Narrative Retrieval is a crucial task since narratives are essential for explaining and understanding events, and multiple related narratives often help to create a holistic view of the event of interest. To accurately identify semantically similar narratives, this paper proposes a novel narrative similarity metric called Facet-based Narrative Similarity (FaNS), based on the classic 5W1H facets (Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How), which are extracted by leveraging the state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs). Unlike existing similarity metrics that only focus on overall lexical/semantic match, FaNS provides a more granular matching along six different facets independently and then combines them. To evaluate FaNS, we created a comprehensive dataset by collecting narratives from AllSides, a third-party news portal. Experimental results demonstrate that the FaNS metric exhibits a higher correlation (37% higher) than traditional text similarity metrics that directly measure the lexical/semantic match between narratives, demonstrating its effectiveness in comparing the finer details between a pair of narratives.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2023.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  5. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  6. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
  7. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  8. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  9. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
  10. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  11. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
  12. 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 409
12 more
  1. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
  2. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
  3. 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 292
  4. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  5. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 241
  6. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
  7. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
  8. 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
  9. 2023TELeR: A General Taxonomy of LLM Prompts for Benchmarking Complex Taskscited by 48
  10. 2018No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual Storytellingcited by 46
  11. 2023LLMs as Factual Reasoners: Insights from Existing Benchmarks and Beyondcited by 37
  12. 2023Redundancy Aware Multi-Reference Based Gainwise Evaluation of Extractive Summarizationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.