Safe Neural Control for Non-Affine Control Systems with Differentiable Control Barrier Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the problem of safety-critical control for non-affine control systems. It has been shown that optimizing quadratic costs subject to state and control constraints can be sub-optimally reduced to a sequence of quadratic programs (QPs) by using Control Barrier Functions (CBFs). Our recently proposed High Order CBFs (HOCBFs) can accommodate constraints of arbitrary relative degree. The main challenges in this approach are that it requires affine control dynamics and the solution of the CBF-based QP is sub-optimal since it is solved point-wise. To address these challenges, we incorporate higher-order CBFs into neural ordinary differential equation-based learning models as differentiable CBFs to guarantee safety for non-affine control systems. The differentiable CBFs are trainable in terms of their parameters, and thus, they can address the conservativeness of CBFs such that the system state will not stay unnecessarily far away from safe set boundaries. Moreover, the imitation learning model is capable of learning complex and optimal control policies that are usually intractable online. We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework on LiDAR-based autonomous driving and compare it with existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2023.
Builds on
12 of 29 references.
References · 12
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 588
- 2022Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methodscited by 148
- 2019Control Barrier Functions for Systems with High Relative Degreecited by 30
- 2021Learning Interactive Driving Policies via Data-driven Simulationcited by 17
- 2022On the Forward Invariance of Neural ODEscited by 10
- 2020Integral Control Barrier Functions for Dynamically Defined Control Lawscited by 6
- 2020Sufficient Conditions for Feasibility of Optimal Control Problems Using Control Barrier Functionscited by 6
- 2021Inverse Optimal Safety Filterscited by 3
- 2022Control Barrier Functions for Systems with Multiple Control Inputscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025End-to-End Training of High-Dimensional Optimal Control with Implicit Hamiltonians via Jacobian-Free Backpropagationcited by 3
- 2025Leveraging Analytic Gradients in Provably Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Differentiable Policy Transport over Multi-Layer Network Feasibility Geometrycited by 0
- 2026Differentiable Policy Transport over Multi-Layer Network Feasibility Geometry2 Aug 2026
- 2025End-to-End Training of High-Dimensional Optimal Control with Implicit Hamiltonians via Jacobian-Free Backpropagation1 Oct 2025
- 2025Leveraging Analytic Gradients in Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning2 Jun 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2020Training Neural Network Controllers Using Control Barrier Functions in the Presence of Disturbances
- 2025Learning Conservative Neural Control Barrier Functions from Offline Data
- 2020Learning Control Barrier Functions from Expert Demonstrations
- 2025V-OCBF: Learning Safety Filters from Offline Data via Value-Guided Offline Control Barrier Functions
- 2026Safety-Guaranteed Imitation Learning from Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Spacecraft Close Proximity Operations
- 2023Neural Differentiable Integral Control Barrier Functions for Unknown Nonlinear Systems with Input Constraints
- 2022End-to-End Imitation Learning with Safety Guarantees using Control Barrier Functions
- 2024Semi-Supervised Safe Visuomotor Policy Synthesis using Barrier Certificates