mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pareto Frontiers in Neural Feature Learning: Data, Compute, Width, and Luck

arXiv 2309.03800 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In modern deep learning, algorithmic choices (such as width, depth, and learning rate) are known to modulate nuanced resource tradeoffs. This work investigates how these complexities necessarily arise for feature learning in the presence of computational-statistical gaps. We begin by considering offline sparse parity learning, a supervised classification problem which admits a statistical query lower bound for gradient-based training of a multilayer perceptron. This lower bound can be interpreted as a multi-resource tradeoff frontier: successful learning can only occur if one is sufficiently rich (large model), knowledgeable (large dataset), patient (many training iterations), or lucky (many random guesses). We show, theoretically and experimentally, that sparse initialization and increasing network width yield significant improvements in sample efficiency in this setting. Here, width plays the role of parallel search: it amplifies the probability of finding "lottery ticket" neurons, which learn sparse features more sample-efficiently. Finally, we show that the synthetic sparse parity task can be useful as a proxy for real problems requiring axis-aligned feature learning. We demonstrate improved sample efficiency on tabular classification benchmarks by using wide, sparsely-initialized MLP models; these networks sometimes outperform tuned random forests.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

Builds on

44 of 74 references.

References · 44

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  6. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  7. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  8. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
  9. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
  10. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  11. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
  12. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
32 more
  1. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 659
  2. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
  4. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
  5. 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
  6. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 288
  7. 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
  8. 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 187
  9. 2022Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descentcited by 161
  10. 2022High-dimensional Asymptotics of Feature Learning: How One Gradient Step Improves the Representationcited by 150
  11. 2022Omnigrok: Grokking Beyond Algorithmic Datacited by 146
  12. 2023SGD learning on neural networks: leap complexity and saddle-to-saddle dynamicscited by 143
  13. 2022The merged-staircase property: a necessary and nearly sufficient condition for SGD learning of sparse functions on two-layer neural networkscited by 142
  14. 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
  15. 2018Regularization Matters: Generalization and Optimization of Neural Nets v.s. their Induced Kernelcited by 131
  16. 2020Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inferencecited by 119
  17. 2022Learning Single-Index Models with Shallow Neural Networkscited by 92
  18. 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 85
  19. 2023A Tale of Two Circuits: Grokking as Competition of Sparse and Dense Subnetworkscited by 83
  20. 2017Failures of Gradient-Based Deep Learningcited by 80
  21. 2020Learning Parities with Neural Networkscited by 78
  22. 2023Smoothing the Landscape Boosts the Signal for SGD: Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning Single Index Modelscited by 61
  23. 2022A Theoretical Analysis on Feature Learning in Neural Networks: Emergence from Inputs and Advantage over Fixed Featurescited by 49
  24. 2015Statistical Query Algorithms for Mean Vector Estimation and Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 41
  25. 2021Quantifying the Benefit of Using Differentiable Learning over Tangent Kernelscited by 41
  26. 2023Scaling MLPs: A Tale of Inductive Biascited by 37
  27. 2022Random Feature Amplification: Feature Learning and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 35
  28. 2020Learning Polynomials of Few Relevant Dimensionscited by 34
  29. 2021Locally Sparse Neural Networks for Tabular Biomedical Datacited by 34
  30. 2020Approximate is Good Enough: Probabilistic Variants of Dimensional and Margin Complexitycited by 25
  31. 2022Feature selection with gradient descent on two-layer networks in low-rotation regimescited by 14
  32. 2022Sparse tree-based initialization for neural networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: