Do We Still Need Non-Maximum Suppression? Accurate Confidence Estimates and Implicit Duplication Modeling with IoU-Aware Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Object detectors are at the heart of many semi- and fully autonomous decision systems and are poised to become even more indispensable. They are, however, still lacking in accessibility and can sometimes produce unreliable predictions. Especially concerning in this regard are the -- essentially hand-crafted -- non-maximum suppression algorithms that lead to an obfuscated prediction process and biased confidence estimates. We show that we can eliminate classic NMS-style post-processing by using IoU-aware calibration. IoU-aware calibration is a conditional Beta calibration; this makes it parallelizable with no hyper-parameters. Instead of arbitrary cutoffs or discounts, it implicitly accounts for the likelihood of each detection being a duplicate and adjusts the confidence score accordingly, resulting in empirically based precision estimates for each detection. Our extensive experiments on diverse detection architectures show that the proposed IoU-aware calibration can successfully model duplicate detections and improve calibration. Compared to the standard sequential NMS and calibration approach, our joint modeling can deliver performance gains over the best NMS-based alternative while producing consistently better-calibrated confidence predictions with less complexity. The hyperlinkhttps://github.com/Blueblue4/IoU-AwareCalibrationcode for all our experiments is publicly available.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2023.
Builds on
30 of 53 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,488
- 2019Objects as Pointscited by 1,175
- 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,071
- 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 691
- 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 495
18 more
- 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
- 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 443
- 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 382
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
- 2020VarifocalNet: An IoU-aware Dense Object Detectorcited by 231
- 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 176
- 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98
- 2022Group DETR: Fast DETR Training with Group-Wise One-to-Many Assignmentcited by 98
- 2021CBNet: A Composite Backbone Network Architecture for Object Detectioncited by 77
- 2019Adaptive NMS: Refining Pedestrian Detection in a Crowdcited by 66
- 2021GrooMeD-NMS: Grouped Mathematically Differentiable NMS for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 66
- 2022NMS Strikes Backcited by 33
- 2017Improving Object Localization with Fitness NMS and Bounded IoU Losscited by 31
- 2020NOH-NMS: Improving Pedestrian Detection by Nearby Objects Hallucinationcited by 9
- 2021From Black-box to White-box: Examining Confidence Calibration under different Conditionscited by 8
- 2021The Box Size Confidence Bias Harms Your Object Detectorcited by 5
- 2014Constructions for a bivariate beta distributioncited by 4
- 2020ASAP-NMS: Accelerating Non-Maximum Suppression Using Spatially Aware Priorscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.