mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative Analysis of CPU and GPU Profiling for Deep Learning Models

arXiv 2309.02521 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2023cs.DC cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Learning(DL) and Machine Learning(ML) applications are rapidly increasing in recent days. Massive amounts of data are being generated over the internet which can derive meaningful results by the use of ML and DL algorithms. Hardware resources and open-source libraries have made it easy to implement these algorithms. Tensorflow and Pytorch are one of the leading frameworks for implementing ML projects. By using those frameworks, we can trace the operations executed on both GPU and CPU to analyze the resource allocations and consumption. This paper presents the time and memory allocation of CPU and GPU while training deep neural networks using Pytorch. This paper analysis shows that GPU has a lower running time as compared to CPU for deep neural networks. For a simpler network, there are not many significant improvements in GPU over the CPU.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.

Builds on

3 of 11 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  3. 2020Comparative Analysis of Multiple Deep CNN Models for Waste Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.