mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Minimax Regret in Online Ranking with Top-k Feedback

arXiv 2309.02425 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In online ranking, a learning algorithm sequentially ranks a set of items and receives feedback on its ranking in the form of relevance scores. Since obtaining relevance scores typically involves human annotation, it is of great interest to consider a partial feedback setting where feedback is restricted to the top-k items in the rankings. Chaudhuri and Tewari [2017] developed a framework to analyze online ranking algorithms with top k feedback. A key element in their work was the use of techniques from partial monitoring. In this paper, we further investigate online ranking with top k feedback and solve some open problems posed by Chaudhuri and Tewari [2017]. We provide a full characterization of minimax regret rates with the top k feedback model for all k and for the following ranking performance measures: Pairwise Loss, Discounted Cumulative Gain, and Precision@n. In addition, we give an efficient algorithm that achieves the minimax regret rate for Precision@n.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.

Builds on

7 of 17 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019An Information-Theoretic Approach to Minimax Regret in Partial Monitoringcited by 41
  2. 2020Mirror Descent and the Information Ratiocited by 39
  3. 2019Exploration by Optimisation in Partial Monitoringcited by 20
  4. 2018Cleaning up the neighborhood: A full classification for adversarial partial monitoringcited by 16
  5. 2022Minimax Regret for Partial Monitoring: Infinite Outcomes and Rustichini's Regretcited by 13
  6. 2020Analysis and Design of Thompson Sampling for Stochastic Partial Monitoringcited by 9
  7. 2016Online Learning to Rank with Top-k Feedbackcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.