Exact Inference for Continuous-Time Gaussian Process Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physical systems can often be described via a continuous-time dynamical system. In practice, the true system is often unknown and has to be learned from measurement data. Since data is typically collected in discrete time, e.g. by sensors, most methods in Gaussian process (GP) dynamics model learning are trained on one-step ahead predictions. This can become problematic in several scenarios, e.g. if measurements are provided at irregularly-sampled time steps or physical system properties have to be conserved. Thus, we aim for a GP model of the true continuous-time dynamics. Higher-order numerical integrators provide the necessary tools to address this problem by discretizing the dynamics function with arbitrary accuracy. Many higher-order integrators require dynamics evaluations at intermediate time steps making exact GP inference intractable. In previous work, this problem is often tackled by approximating the GP posterior with variational inference. However, exact GP inference is preferable in many scenarios, e.g. due to its mathematical guarantees. In order to make direct inference tractable, we propose to leverage multistep and Taylor integrators. We demonstrate how to derive flexible inference schemes for these types of integrators. Further, we derive tailored sampling schemes that allow to draw consistent dynamics functions from the learned posterior. This is crucial to sample consistent predictions from the dynamics model. We demonstrate empirically and theoretically that our approach yields an accurate representation of the continuous-time system.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.
Builds on
15 of 35 references.
References · 15
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 352
- 2020Efficiently Sampling Functions from Gaussian Process Posteriorscited by 127
- 2017Numerical Gaussian Processes for Time-dependent and Non-linear Partial Differential Equationscited by 72
- 2018Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Modelscited by 64
- 2018Learning unknown ODE models with Gaussian processescited by 54
- 2021Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 49
- 2020ResNet After All? Neural ODEs and Their Numerical Solutioncited by 20
- 2018Fast Gaussian Process Based Gradient Matching for Parameter Identification in Systems of Nonlinear ODEscited by 17
- 2019Discovery of Dynamics Using Linear Multistep Methodscited by 17
- 2020Symplectic Gaussian Process Regression of Hamiltonian Flow Mapscited by 17
- 2019On Simulation and Trajectory Prediction with Gaussian Process Dynamicscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024System-Aware Neural ODE Processes for Few-Shot Bayesian Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025Learning Passive Continuous-Time Dynamics with Multistep Port-Hamiltonian Gaussian Processescited by 0
- 2026A Quadratic Order Reduction -- Gaussian Process Ordinary Differential Equation framework for the inference of Large Continuous Dynamical Systemscited by 0
- 2026A Quadratic Order Reduction -- Gaussian Process Ordinary Differential Equation framework for the inference of Large Continuous Dynamical Systems11 Jun 2026
- 2025Learning Passive Continuous-Time Dynamics with Multistep Port-Hamiltonian Gaussian Processes1 Oct 2025
- 2024System-Aware Neural ODE Processes for Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization4 Jun 2024