On Simulation and Trajectory Prediction with Gaussian Process Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Established techniques for simulation and prediction with Gaussian process (GP) dynamics often implicitly make use of an independence assumption on successive function evaluations of the dynamics model. This can result in significant error and underestimation of the prediction uncertainty, potentially leading to failures in safety-critical applications. This paper discusses methods that explicitly take the correlation of successive function evaluations into account. We first describe two sampling-based techniques; one approach provides samples of the true trajectory distribution, suitable for `ground truth' simulations, while the other draws function samples from basis function approximations of the GP. Second, we propose a linearization-based technique that directly provides approximations of the trajectory distribution, taking correlations explicitly into account. We demonstrate the procedures in simple numerical examples, contrasting the results with established methods.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2023Machine Learning for Autonomous Vehicle's Trajectory Prediction: A comprehensive survey, Challenges, and Future Research Directionscited by 23
- 2022Targeted Adversarial Attacks against Neural Network Trajectory Predictorscited by 11
- 2024Towards safe and tractable Gaussian process-based MPC: Efficient sampling within a sequential quadratic programming frameworkcited by 6
- 2025Koopman-Equivariant Gaussian Processescited by 6
- 2025Efficiently Generating Correlated Sample Paths from Multi-step Time Series Foundation Modelscited by 4
- 2023Safe Machine-Learning-supported Model Predictive Force and Motion Control in Roboticscited by 3
- 2023Exact Inference for Continuous-Time Gaussian Process Dynamicscited by 3
- 2024GRANP: A Graph Recurrent Attentive Neural Process Model for Vehicle Trajectory Predictioncited by 3
- 2022The Past Does Matter: Correlation of Subsequent States in Trajectory Predictions of Gaussian Process Modelscited by 2
- 2021Shallow Representation is Deep: Learning Uncertainty-aware and Worst-case Random Feature Dynamicscited by 0
- 2021Gaussian Process for Trajectoriescited by 0
- 2025Efficiently Generating Correlated Sample Paths from Multi-step Time Series Foundation Models2 Oct 2025
- 2025Koopman-Equivariant Gaussian Processes10 Feb 2025
- 2024Towards safe and tractable Gaussian process-based MPC: Efficient sampling within a sequential quadratic programming framework13 Sep 2024
- 2024GRANP: A Graph Recurrent Attentive Neural Process Model for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction9 Apr 2024
- 2023Exact Inference for Continuous-Time Gaussian Process Dynamics5 Sep 2023
- 2023Machine Learning for Autonomous Vehicle's Trajectory Prediction: A comprehensive survey, Challenges, and Future Research Directions12 Jul 2023
- 2023Safe Machine-Learning-supported Model Predictive Force and Motion Control in Robotics8 Mar 2023
- 2022Targeted Adversarial Attacks against Neural Network Trajectory Predictors8 Dec 2022
- 2022The Past Does Matter: Correlation of Subsequent States in Trajectory Predictions of Gaussian Process Models20 Nov 2022
- 2021Gaussian Process for Trajectories7 Oct 2021
- 2021Shallow Representation is Deep: Learning Uncertainty-aware and Worst-case Random Feature Dynamics24 Jun 2021