mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring the Robustness of Human Parsers Towards Common Corruptions

arXiv 2309.00938 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human parsing aims to segment each pixel of the human image with fine-grained semantic categories. However, current human parsers trained with clean data are easily confused by numerous image corruptions such as blur and noise. To improve the robustness of human parsers, in this paper, we construct three corruption robustness benchmarks, termed LIP-C, ATR-C, and Pascal-Person-Part-C, to assist us in evaluating the risk tolerance of human parsing models. Inspired by the data augmentation strategy, we propose a novel heterogeneous augmentation-enhanced mechanism to bolster robustness under commonly corrupted conditions. Specifically, two types of data augmentations from different views, i.e., image-aware augmentation and model-aware image-to-image transformation, are integrated in a sequential manner for adapting to unforeseen image corruptions. The image-aware augmentation can enrich the high diversity of training images with the help of common image operations. The model-aware augmentation strategy that improves the diversity of input data by considering the model's randomness. The proposed method is model-agnostic, and it can plug and play into arbitrary state-of-the-art human parsing frameworks. The experimental results show that the proposed method demonstrates good universality which can improve the robustness of the human parsing models and even the semantic segmentation models when facing various image common corruptions. Meanwhile, it can still obtain approximate performance on clean data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2023.

Builds on

47 of 73 references.

References · 47

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  2. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  3. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  5. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
  6. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  7. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  8. 2019Segmentation Transformer: Object-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentationcited by 576
  9. 2019Res2Net: A New Multi-scale Backbone Architecturecited by 470
  10. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 336
  11. 2021Exploring Cross-Image Pixel Contrast for Semantic Segmentationcited by 242
  12. 2014Detect What You Can: Detecting and Representing Objects using Holistic Models and Body Partscited by 232
35 more
  1. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 182
  2. 2019Self-Correction for Human Parsingcited by 180
  3. 2018Learning Human-Object Interactions by Graph Parsing Neural Networkscited by 176
  4. 2016Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Trainingcited by 156
  5. 2020Controllable Person Image Synthesis with Attribute-Decomposed GANcited by 150
  6. 2020Towards Photo-Realistic Virtual Try-On by Adaptively GeneratingleftrightarrowPreserving Image Contentcited by 149
  7. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
  8. 2022Rethinking Semantic Segmentation: A Prototype Viewcited by 140
  9. 2020GridMask Data Augmentationcited by 123
  10. 2020Identity-Guided Human Semantic Parsing for Person Re-Identificationcited by 118
  11. 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
  12. 2019Towards Multi-pose Guided Virtual Try-on Networkcited by 95
  13. 2021AugMax: Adversarial Composition of Random Augmentations for Robust Trainingcited by 90
  14. 2022Deep Hierarchical Semantic Segmentationcited by 84
  15. 2019Graphonomy: Universal Human Parsing via Graph Transfer Learningcited by 81
  16. 2018Look into Person: Joint Body Parsing & Pose Estimation Network and A New Benchmarkcited by 79
  17. 2018Devil in the Details: Towards Accurate Single and Multiple Human Parsingcited by 64
  18. 2021Disentangled Cycle Consistency for Highly-realistic Virtual Try-Oncited by 62
  19. 2015Deep Human Parsing with Active Template Regressioncited by 51
  20. 2016Semantic Object Parsing with Graph LSTMcited by 44
  21. 2021When Human Pose Estimation Meets Robustness: Adversarial Algorithms and Benchmarkscited by 41
  22. 2020Hierarchical Human Parsing with Typed Part-Relation Reasoningcited by 38
  23. 2020Dynamic Divide-and-Conquer Adversarial Training for Robust Semantic Segmentationcited by 38
  24. 2020Learning Compositional Neural Information Fusion for Human Parsingcited by 36
  25. 2021Differentiable Multi-Granularity Human Representation Learning for Instance-Aware Human Semantic Parsingcited by 31
  26. 2019Learning Semantic Neural Tree for Human Parsingcited by 29
  27. 2018Macro-Micro Adversarial Network for Human Parsingcited by 28
  28. 2019Grapy-ML: Graph Pyramid Mutual Learning for Cross-dataset Human Parsingcited by 23
  29. 2020Correlating Edge, Pose with Parsingcited by 18
  30. 2020Increasing the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models with Painting-by-Numberscited by 17
  31. 2015Semantic Object Parsing with Local-Global Long Short-Term Memorycited by 16
  32. 2020Self-Learning with Rectification Strategy for Human Parsingcited by 12
  33. 2018Cross-domain Human Parsing via Adversarial Feature and Label Adaptationcited by 11
  34. 2022Consistency and Diversity induced Human Motion Segmentationcited by 7
  35. 2019GraspNet: A Large-Scale Clustered and Densely Annotated Dataset for Object Graspingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.