mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Impact of Visual Context on Noisy Multimodal NMT: An Empirical Study for English to Indian Languages

arXiv 2308.16075 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural Machine Translation (NMT) has made remarkable progress using large-scale textual data, but the potential of incorporating multimodal inputs, especially visual information, remains underexplored in high-resource settings. While prior research has focused on using multimodal data in low-resource scenarios, this study examines how image features impact translation when added to a large-scale, pre-trained unimodal NMT system. Surprisingly, the study finds that images might be redundant in this context. Additionally, the research introduces synthetic noise to assess whether images help the model handle textual noise. Multimodal models slightly outperform text-only models in noisy settings, even when random images are used. The study's experiments translate from English to Hindi, Bengali, and Malayalam, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art benchmarks. Interestingly, the effect of visual context varies with the level of source text noise: no visual context works best for non-noisy translations, cropped image features are optimal for low noise, and full image features perform better in high-noise scenarios. This sheds light on the role of visual context, especially in noisy settings, and opens up a new research direction for Noisy Neural Machine Translation in multimodal setups. The research emphasizes the importance of combining visual and textual information to improve translation across various environments. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/babangain/indicMMT.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2023.

Builds on

41 of 92 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
  6. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
  7. 2016Multi30K: Multilingual English-German Image Descriptionscited by 250
  8. 2021ZeroCap: Zero-Shot Image-to-Text Generation for Visual-Semantic Arithmeticcited by 150
  9. 2021Samanantar: The Largest Publicly Available Parallel Corpora Collection for 11 Indic Languagescited by 136
  10. 2019Robust Neural Machine Translation with Doubly Adversarial Inputscited by 106
  11. 2017Neural Machine Translation with Extended Contextcited by 95
  12. 2018Document-Level Neural Machine Translation with Hierarchical Attention Networkscited by 85
29 more
  1. 2017Data Noising as Smoothing in Neural Network Language Modelscited by 78
  2. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  3. 2017The IIT Bombay English-Hindi Parallel Corpuscited by 75
  4. 2019Probing the Need for Visual Context in Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 54
  5. 2019Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translationcited by 52
  6. 2017Doubly-Attentive Decoder for Multi-modal Neural Machine Translationcited by 46
  7. 2017Incorporating Global Visual Features into Attention-Based Neural Machine Translationcited by 39
  8. 2017Imagination improves Multimodal Translationcited by 38
  9. 2021When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Explorationcited by 36
  10. 2018Towards Robust Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
  11. 2020Does Multi-Encoder Help? A Case Study on Context-Aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 34
  12. 2022On Vision Features in Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 31
  13. 2019Distilling Translations with Visual Awarenesscited by 30
  14. 2020Diving Deep into Context-Aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 25
  15. 2019Naver Labs Europe's Systems for the WMT19 Machine Translation Robustness Taskcited by 23
  16. 2018A Visual Attention Grounding Neural Model for Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 22
  17. 2018The MeMAD Submission to the WMT18 Multimodal Translation Taskcited by 22
  18. 2019Hindi Visual Genome: A Dataset for Multimodal English-to-Hindi Machine Translationcited by 16
  19. 2022Distill the Image to Nowhere: Inversion Knowledge Distillation for Multimodal Machine Translationcited by 13
  20. 2016Does Multimodality Help Human and Machine for Translation and Image Captioning?cited by 7
  21. 2020Revisiting Robust Neural Machine Translation: A Transformer Case Studycited by 7
  22. 2022ERNIE-UniX2: A Unified Cross-lingual Cross-modal Framework for Understanding and Generationcited by 7
  23. 2021ViTA: Visual-Linguistic Translation by Aligning Object Tagscited by 5
  24. 2023Challenges in Context-Aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 5
  25. 2019CUNI System for the WMT19 Robustness Taskcited by 2
  26. 2021IITP at WAT 2021: System description for English-Hindi Multimodal Translation Taskcited by 2
  27. 2021Secoco: Self-Correcting Encoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 2
  28. 2022Silo NLP's Participation at WAT2022cited by 2
  29. 2023A Case Study on Context Encoding in Multi-Encoder based Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.