mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Deep Learning for Full-disk Solar Flare Prediction with Empirical Insights from Guided Grad-CAM Explanations

arXiv 2308.15712 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2023astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IM cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study progresses solar flare prediction research by presenting a full-disk deep-learning model to forecast ≥M-class solar flares and evaluating its efficacy on both central (within ±70^circ) and near-limb (beyond ±70^circ) events, showcasing qualitative assessment of post hoc explanations for the model's predictions, and providing empirical findings from human-centered quantitative assessments of these explanations. Our model is trained using hourly full-disk line-of-sight magnetogram images to predict ≥M-class solar flares within the subsequent 24-hour prediction window. Additionally, we apply the Guided Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Guided Grad-CAM) attribution method to interpret our model's predictions and evaluate the explanations. Our analysis unveils that full-disk solar flare predictions correspond with active region characteristics. The following points represent the most important findings of our study: (1) Our deep learning models achieved an average true skill statistic (TSS) of ~0.51 and a Heidke skill score (HSS) of ~0.38, exhibiting skill to predict solar flares where for central locations the average recall is ~0.75 (recall values for X- and M-class are 0.95 and 0.73 respectively) and for the near-limb flares the average recall is ~0.52 (recall values for X- and M-class are 0.74 and 0.50 respectively); (2) qualitative examination of the model's explanations reveals that it discerns and leverages features linked to active regions in both central and near-limb locations within full-disk magnetograms to produce respective predictions. In essence, our models grasp the shape and texture-based properties of flaring active regions, even in proximity to limb areas -- a novel and essential capability with considerable significance for operational forecasting systems.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 56 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  3. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  4. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  5. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  6. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  7. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  8. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  9. 2021Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
  10. 2022Towards Coupling Full-disk and Active Region-based Flare Prediction for Operational Space Weather Forecastingcited by 17
  11. 2022Predicting Solar Flares Using CNN and LSTM on Two Solar Cycles of Active Region Datacited by 15
  12. 2021All-Clear Flare Prediction Using Interval-based Time Series Classifierscited by 13
2 more
  1. 2023Explaining Full-disk Deep Learning Model for Solar Flare Prediction using Attribution Methodscited by 12
  2. 2023Explainable Deep Learning-based Solar Flare Prediction with post hoc Attention for Operational Forecastingcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

6 papers.