mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explaining Full-disk Deep Learning Model for Solar Flare Prediction using Attribution Methods

arXiv 2307.15878 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2023cs.LG astro-ph.SRcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper contributes to the growing body of research on deep learning methods for solar flare prediction, primarily focusing on highly overlooked near-limb flares and utilizing the attribution methods to provide a post hoc qualitative explanation of the model's predictions. We present a solar flare prediction model, which is trained using hourly full-disk line-of-sight magnetogram images and employs a binary prediction mode to forecast ≥M-class flares that may occur within the following 24-hour period. To address the class imbalance, we employ a fusion of data augmentation and class weighting techniques; and evaluate the overall performance of our model using the true skill statistic (TSS) and Heidke skill score (HSS). Moreover, we applied three attribution methods, namely Guided Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping, Integrated Gradients, and Deep Shapley Additive Explanations, to interpret and cross-validate our model's predictions with the explanations. Our analysis revealed that full-disk prediction of solar flares aligns with characteristics related to active regions (ARs). In particular, the key findings of this study are: (1) our deep learning models achieved an average TSS=0.51 and HSS=0.35, and the results further demonstrate a competent capability to predict near-limb solar flares and (2) the qualitative analysis of the model explanation indicates that our model identifies and uses features associated with ARs in central and near-limb locations from full-disk magnetograms to make corresponding predictions. In other words, our models learn the shape and texture-based characteristics of flaring ARs even at near-limb areas, which is a novel and critical capability with significant implications for operational forecasting.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2023.

Builds on

16 of 44 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  7. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  8. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  9. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  10. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  11. 2021Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
  12. 2021How to Train Your Flare Prediction Model: Revisiting Robust Sampling of Rare Eventscited by 26
4 more
  1. 2022Towards Coupling Full-disk and Active Region-based Flare Prediction for Operational Space Weather Forecastingcited by 17
  2. 2022Predicting Solar Flares Using CNN and LSTM on Two Solar Cycles of Active Region Datacited by 15
  3. 2021All-Clear Flare Prediction Using Interval-based Time Series Classifierscited by 13
  4. 2019Challenges with Extreme Class-Imbalance and Temporal Coherence: A Study on Solar Flare Datacited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 4.

12 papers.