mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Context-Aware Composition of Agent Policies by Markov Decision Process Entity Embeddings and Agent Ensembles

arXiv 2308.14521 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2023cs.AI cs.LG cs.PFcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational agents support humans in many areas of life and are therefore found in heterogeneous contexts. This means they operate in rapidly changing environments and can be confronted with huge state and action spaces. In order to perform services and carry out activities in a goal-oriented manner, agents require prior knowledge and therefore have to develop and pursue context-dependent policies. However, prescribing policies in advance is limited and inflexible, especially in dynamically changing environments. Moreover, the context of an agent determines its choice of actions. Since the environments can be stochastic and complex in terms of the number of states and feasible actions, activities are usually modelled in a simplified way by Markov decision processes so that, e.g., agents with reinforcement learning are able to learn policies, that help to capture the context and act accordingly to optimally perform activities. However, training policies for all possible contexts using reinforcement learning is time-consuming. A requirement and challenge for agents is to learn strategies quickly and respond immediately in cross-context environments and applications, e.g., the Internet, service robotics, cyber-physical systems. In this work, we propose a novel simulation-based approach that enables a) the representation of heterogeneous contexts through knowledge graphs and entity embeddings and b) the context-aware composition of policies on demand by ensembles of agents running in parallel. The evaluation we conducted with the "Virtual Home" dataset indicates that agents with a need to switch seamlessly between different contexts, can request on-demand composed policies that lead to the successful completion of context-appropriate activities without having to learn these policies in lengthy training steps and episodes, in contrast to agents that use reinforcement learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 51 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  5. 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 415
  6. 2020Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Designcited by 275
  7. 2021Contrastive Behavioral Similarity Embeddings for Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 123
  8. 2019Reinforcement Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Explainable Recommendationcited by 102
  9. 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 64
  10. 2020Action Space Shaping in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
  11. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes on Medical Registry Datacited by 23
  12. 2021Reinforcement Learning-powered Semantic Communication via Semantic Similaritycited by 15
2 more
  1. 2021Graph-based Task-specific Prediction Models for Interactions between Deformable and Rigid Objectscited by 10
  2. 2017Learning Policies for Markov Decision Processes from Datacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.