mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pruning the Unlabeled Data to Improve Semi-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2308.14058 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the domain of semi-supervised learning (SSL), the conventional approach involves training a learner with a limited amount of labeled data alongside a substantial volume of unlabeled data, both drawn from the same underlying distribution. However, for deep learning models, this standard practice may not yield optimal results. In this research, we propose an alternative perspective, suggesting that distributions that are more readily separable could offer superior benefits to the learner as compared to the original distribution. To achieve this, we present PruneSSL, a practical technique for selectively removing examples from the original unlabeled dataset to enhance its separability. We present an empirical study, showing that although PruneSSL reduces the quantity of available training data for the learner, it significantly improves the performance of various competitive SSL algorithms, thereby achieving state-of-the-art results across several image classification tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2023.

Builds on

27 of 46 references.

References · 27

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  3. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  4. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  6. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  7. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  9. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 554
  10. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
  11. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 432
  12. 2019On The Power of Curriculum Learning in Training Deep Networkscited by 286
15 more
  1. 2019Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 251
  2. 2021A Survey on Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 251
  3. 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
  4. 2020CoMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Contrastive Graph Regularizationcited by 167
  5. 2021Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 148
  6. 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
  7. 2020An Overview of Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 121
  8. 2022SimMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Similarity Matchingcited by 118
  9. 2021AdaMatch: A Unified Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning and Domain Adaptationcited by 104
  10. 2022USB: A Unified Semi-supervised Learning Benchmark for Classificationcited by 95
  11. 2020Not All Unlabeled Data are Equal: Learning to Weight Data in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 53
  12. 2021Poisoning the Unlabeled Dataset of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 44
  13. 2021Low Budget Active Learning via Wasserstein Distance: An Integer Programming Approachcited by 34
  14. 2021Revisiting Consistency Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 34
  15. 2022The Perils of Learning From Unlabeled Data: Backdoor Attacks on Semi-supervised Learningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.