Unveiling the Role of Message Passing in Dual-Privacy Preservation on GNNs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful tools for learning representations on graphs, such as social networks. However, their vulnerability to privacy inference attacks restricts their practicality, especially in high-stake domains. To address this issue, privacy-preserving GNNs have been proposed, focusing on preserving node and/or link privacy. This work takes a step back and investigates how GNNs contribute to privacy leakage. Through theoretical analysis and simulations, we identify message passing under structural bias as the core component that allows GNNs to textitpropagate and textitamplify privacy leakage. Building upon these findings, we propose a principled privacy-preserving GNN framework that effectively safeguards both node and link privacy, referred to as dual-privacy preservation. The framework comprises three major modules: a Sensitive Information Obfuscation Module that removes sensitive information from node embeddings, a Dynamic Structure Debiasing Module that dynamically corrects the structural bias, and an Adversarial Learning Module that optimizes the privacy-utility trade-off. Experimental results on four benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed model in protecting both node and link privacy while preserving high utility for downstream tasks, such as node classification.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2023.
Builds on
24 of 53 references.
References · 24
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
- 2018Contextual Stochastic Block Modelscited by 134
- 2021Towards a Unified Framework for Fair and Stable Graph Representation Learningcited by 128
- 2020Quantifying Privacy Leakage in Graph Embeddingcited by 82
- 2021Membership Inference Attack on Graph Neural Networkscited by 81
- 2021Node-Level Membership Inference Attacks Against Graph Neural Networkscited by 80
12 more
- 2013Projection onto the probability simplex: An efficient algorithm with a simple proof, and an applicationcited by 65
- 2021LinkTeller: Recovering Private Edges from Graph Neural Networks via Influence Analysiscited by 65
- 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
- 2021GraphMI: Extracting Private Graph Data from Graph Neural Networkscited by 50
- 2021Adapting Membership Inference Attacks to GNN for Graph Classification: Approaches and Implicationscited by 50
- 2019Graph Neural Networks for Modelling Traffic Participant Interactioncited by 42
- 2019Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving and Task-Oriented Representationscited by 35
- 2016You are Who You Know and How You Behave: Attribute Inference Attacks via Users' Social Friends and Behaviorscited by 34
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Representation Learning on Graphs: A Mutual Information Perspectivecited by 23
- 2020Adversarial Privacy Preserving Graph Embedding against Inference Attackcited by 21
- 2022Towards Private Learning on Decentralized Graphs with Local Differential Privacycited by 16
- 2017Privacy-Preserving Adversarial Networkscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.