Benchmarking Data Efficiency and Computational Efficiency of Temporal Action Localization Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In temporal action localization, given an input video, the goal is to predict which actions it contains, where they begin, and where they end. Training and testing current state-of-the-art deep learning models requires access to large amounts of data and computational power. However, gathering such data is challenging and computational resources might be limited. This work explores and measures how current deep temporal action localization models perform in settings constrained by the amount of data or computational power. We measure data efficiency by training each model on a subset of the training set. We find that TemporalMaxer outperforms other models in data-limited settings. Furthermore, we recommend TriDet when training time is limited. To test the efficiency of the models during inference, we pass videos of different lengths through each model. We find that TemporalMaxer requires the least computational resources, likely due to its simple architecture.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2023.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,668
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 790
- 2019Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 673
- 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 633
- 2020Rescaling Egocentric Visioncited by 540
- 2019BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 329
14 more
- 2022ActionFormer: Localizing Moments of Actions with Transformerscited by 311
- 2018BSN: Boundary Sensitive Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 271
- 2016The THUMOS Challenge on Action Recognition for Videos "in the Wild"cited by 213
- 2019Graph Convolutional Networks for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 208
- 2021End-to-end Temporal Action Detection with Transformercited by 151
- 2023TriDet: Temporal Action Detection with Relative Boundary Modelingcited by 142
- 2017UntrimmedNets for Weakly Supervised Action Recognition and Detectioncited by 130
- 2015Every Moment Counts: Dense Detailed Labeling of Actions in Complex Videoscited by 93
- 2020TSP: Temporally-Sensitive Pretraining of Video Encoders for Localization Taskscited by 77
- 2022Zero-Shot Temporal Action Detection via Vision-Language Promptingcited by 65
- 2023TemporalMaxer: Maximize Temporal Context with only Max Pooling for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 28
- 2019Scale Matters: Temporal Scale Aggregation Network for Precise Action Localization in Untrimmed Videoscited by 17
- 2021Few-Shot Temporal Action Localization with Query Adaptive Transformercited by 15
- 2020Localizing the Common Action Among a Few Videoscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.