mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Motion-to-Matching: A Mixed Paradigm for 3D Single Object Tracking

arXiv 2308.11875 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

3D single object tracking with LiDAR points is an important task in the computer vision field. Previous methods usually adopt the matching-based or motion-centric paradigms to estimate the current target status. However, the former is sensitive to the similar distractors and the sparseness of point cloud due to relying on appearance matching, while the latter usually focuses on short-term motion clues (eg. two frames) and ignores the long-term motion pattern of target. To address these issues, we propose a mixed paradigm with two stages, named MTM-Tracker, which combines motion modeling with feature matching into a single network. Specifically, in the first stage, we exploit the continuous historical boxes as motion prior and propose an encoder-decoder structure to locate target coarsely. Then, in the second stage, we introduce a feature interaction module to extract motion-aware features from consecutive point clouds and match them to refine target movement as well as regress other target states. Extensive experiments validate that our paradigm achieves competitive performance on large-scale datasets (70.9% in KITTI and 51.70% in NuScenes). The code will be open soon at https://github.com/LeoZhiheng/MTM-Tracker.git.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2023.

Builds on

26 of 33 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  3. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  4. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  5. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
  6. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,144
  7. 2019Deep Hough Voting for 3D Object Detection in Point Cloudscited by 648
  8. 2016Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Trackingcited by 568
  9. 2021Transformer Trackingcited by 412
  10. 2018Fast Online Object Tracking and Segmentation: A Unifying Approachcited by 272
  11. 2021Transformer Meets Tracker: Exploiting Temporal Context for Robust Visual Trackingcited by 220
  12. 2020Siamese Box Adaptive Network for Visual Trackingcited by 189
14 more
  1. 2019SiamCAR: Siamese Fully Convolutional Classification and Regression for Visual Trackingcited by 148
  2. 2022AiATrack: Attention in Attention for Transformer Visual Trackingcited by 137
  3. 2021STMTrack: Template-free Visual Tracking with Space-time Memory Networkscited by 91
  4. 2020P2B: Point-to-Box Network for 3D Object Tracking in Point Cloudscited by 84
  5. 2019Leveraging Shape Completion for 3D Siamese Trackingcited by 74
  6. 2021Box-Aware Feature Enhancement for Single Object Tracking on Point Cloudscited by 66
  7. 2021PTTR: Relational 3D Point Cloud Object Tracking with Transformercited by 65
  8. 2021PTT: Point-Track-Transformer Module for 3D Single Object Tracking in Point Cloudscited by 59
  9. 2022Beyond 3D Siamese Tracking: A Motion-Centric Paradigm for 3D Single Object Tracking in Point Cloudscited by 55
  10. 20213D Siamese Voxel-to-BEV Tracker for Sparse Point Cloudscited by 54
  11. 20213D Object Tracking with Transformercited by 49
  12. 20223D Siamese Transformer Network for Single Object Tracking on Point Cloudscited by 44
  13. 2022CXTrack: Improving 3D Point Cloud Tracking with Contextual Informationcited by 28
  14. 2022Exploiting More Information in Sparse Point Cloud for 3D Single Object Trackingcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.