mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Video BagNet: short temporal receptive fields increase robustness in long-term action recognition

arXiv 2308.11249 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous work on long-term video action recognition relies on deep 3D-convolutional models that have a large temporal receptive field (RF). We argue that these models are not always the best choice for temporal modeling in videos. A large temporal receptive field allows the model to encode the exact sub-action order of a video, which causes a performance decrease when testing videos have a different sub-action order. In this work, we investigate whether we can improve the model robustness to the sub-action order by shrinking the temporal receptive field of action recognition models. For this, we design Video BagNet, a variant of the 3D ResNet-50 model with the temporal receptive field size limited to 1, 9, 17 or 33 frames. We analyze Video BagNet on synthetic and real-world video datasets and experimentally compare models with varying temporal receptive fields. We find that short receptive fields are robust to sub-action order changes, while larger temporal receptive fields are sensitive to the sub-action order.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,043
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,476
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,991
  6. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,264
  7. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,291
  8. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,614
  9. 2017Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?cited by 551
  10. 2016Hollywood in Homes: Crowdsourcing Data Collection for Activity Understandingcited by 535
  11. 2017Temporal Relational Reasoning in Videoscited by 324
  12. 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
14 more
  1. 2018Long-Term Feature Banks for Detailed Video Understandingcited by 239
  2. 2021Keeping Your Eye on the Ball: Trajectory Attention in Video Transformerscited by 224
  3. 2017Learning Spatio-Temporal Features with 3D Residual Networks for Action Recognitioncited by 178
  4. 2015Every Moment Counts: Dense Detailed Labeling of Actions in Complex Videoscited by 93
  5. 2018Timeception for Complex Action Recognitioncited by 89
  6. 2021An Image is Worth 16x16 Words, What is a Video Worth?cited by 87
  7. 2017ActionVLAD: Learning spatio-temporal aggregation for action classificationcited by 73
  8. 2020Learning Representations by Predicting Bags of Visual Wordscited by 73
  9. 2019Learning Spatio-Temporal Representation with Local and Global Diffusioncited by 61
  10. 2019VideoGraph: Recognizing Minutes-Long Human Activities in Videoscited by 57
  11. 2017What Actions are Needed for Understanding Human Actions in Videos?cited by 29
  12. 2021No frame left behind: Full Video Action Recognitioncited by 24
  13. 2020PIC: Permutation Invariant Convolution for Recognizing Long-range Activitiescited by 8
  14. 2020TimeGate: Conditional Gating of Segments in Long-range Activitiescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.