A three in one bottom-up framework for simultaneous semantic segmentation, instance segmentation and classification of multi-organ nuclei in digital cancer histology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in digital histology play an essential role in computer-assisted cancer diagnosis; however, it remains challenging. The highest achieved binary and multi-class Panoptic Quality (PQ) remains as low as 0.68 bPQ and 0.49 mPQ, respectively. It is due to the higher staining variability, variability across the tissue, rough clinical conditions, overlapping nuclei, and nuclear class imbalance. The generic deep-learning methods usually rely on end-to-end models, which fail to address these problems associated explicitly with digital histology. In our previous work, DAN-NucNet, we resolved these issues for semantic segmentation with an end-to-end model. This work extends our previous model to simultaneous instance segmentation and classification. We introduce additional decoder heads with independent weighted losses, which produce semantic segmentation, edge proposals, and classification maps. We use the outputs from the three-head model to apply post-processing to produce the final segmentation and classification. Our multi-stage approach utilizes edge proposals and semantic segmentations compared to direct segmentation and classification strategies followed by most state-of-the-art methods. Due to this, we demonstrate a significant performance improvement in producing high-quality instance segmentation and nuclei classification. We have achieved a 0.841 Dice score for semantic segmentation, 0.713 bPQ scores for instance segmentation, and 0.633 mPQ for nuclei classification. Our proposed framework is generalized across 19 types of tissues. Furthermore, the framework is less complex compared to the state-of-the-art.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.
Builds on
19 of 47 references.
References · 19
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
- 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
- 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 443
- 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 388
- 2019RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detectioncited by 264
- 2019CenterMask : Real-Time Anchor-Free Instance Segmentationcited by 201
- 2019PolarMask: Single Shot Instance Segmentation with Polar Representationcited by 188
- 2020PanNuke Dataset Extension, Insights and Baselinescited by 114
- 2019TensorMask: A Foundation for Dense Object Segmentationcited by 101
- 2018Methods for Segmentation and Classification of Digital Microscopy Tissue Imagescited by 73
7 more
- 2018Micro-Net: A unified model for segmentation of various objects in microscopy imagescited by 56
- 2017MaskLab: Instance Segmentation by Refining Object Detection with Semantic and Direction Featurescited by 54
- 2019CIA-Net: Robust Nuclei Instance Segmentation with Contour-aware Information Aggregationcited by 54
- 2017Detecting Cancer Metastases on Gigapixel Pathology Imagescited by 52
- 2020CentripetalNet: Pursuing High-quality Keypoint Pairs for Object Detectioncited by 41
- 2022One Model is All You Need: Multi-Task Learning Enables Simultaneous Histology Image Segmentation and Classificationcited by 38
- 2020SaccadeNet: A Fast and Accurate Object Detectorcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.