mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLaMA-Reviewer: Advancing Code Review Automation with Large Language Models through Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2308.11148 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2023cs.SE cs.CL cs.LGcited by 47

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The automation of code review activities, a long-standing pursuit in software engineering, has been primarily addressed by numerous domain-specific pre-trained models. Despite their success, these models frequently demand extensive resources for pre-training from scratch. In contrast, Large Language Models (LLMs) provide an intriguing alternative, given their remarkable capabilities when supplemented with domain-specific knowledge. However, their potential for automating code review tasks remains largely unexplored. In response to this research gap, we present LLaMA-Reviewer, an innovative framework that leverages the capabilities of LLaMA, a popular LLM, in the realm of code review. Mindful of resource constraints, this framework employs parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, delivering high performance while using less than 1% of trainable parameters. An extensive evaluation of LLaMA-Reviewer is conducted on two diverse, publicly available datasets. Notably, even with the smallest LLaMA base model consisting of 6.7B parameters and a limited number of tuning epochs, LLaMA-Reviewer equals the performance of existing code-review-focused models. The ablation experiments provide insights into the influence of various fine-tuning process components, including input representation, instruction tuning, and different PEFT methods. To foster continuous progress in this field, the code and all PEFT-weight plugins have been made open-source.

Key facts. Cited by 47 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.

Builds on

35 of 68 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  6. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  9. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  10. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  11. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  12. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,711
23 more
  1. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  2. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  3. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 906
  4. 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 885
  5. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
  6. 2023StarCoder: may the source be with you!cited by 799
  7. 2023LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attentioncited by 781
  8. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
  9. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  10. 2022InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesiscited by 498
  11. 2021Unified Pre-training for Program Understanding and Generationcited by 366
  12. 2023CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 333
  13. 2023Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpacacited by 305
  14. 2018SequenceR: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repaircited by 145
  15. 2018An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translationcited by 108
  16. 2022Automating Code Review Activities by Large-Scale Pre-trainingcited by 98
  17. 2022Using Pre-Trained Models to Boost Code Review Automationcited by 63
  18. 2021Towards Automating Code Review Activitiescited by 54
  19. 2019On Learning Meaningful Code Changes via Neural Machine Translationcited by 50
  20. 2022CoditT5: Pretraining for Source Code and Natural Language Editingcited by 45
  21. 2022AUGER: Automatically Generating Review Comments with Pre-training Modelscited by 23
  22. 2019CORE: Automating Review Recommendation for Code Changescited by 14
  23. 2022Modeling Review History for Reviewer Recommendation:A Hypergraph Approachcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 12; 2025: 21; 2026: 12.

47 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Exploring Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Codecited by 107
  2. 2023Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Codecited by 62
  3. 2023RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repaircited by 50
  4. 2024Low-Rank Adaptation for Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 37
  5. 2024CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Reviewcited by 34
  6. 2024Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning: A Comprehensive Analysis Across Applicationscited by 25
  7. 2024Software Vulnerability and Functionality Assessment using LLMscited by 11
  8. 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysiscited by 11
  9. 2025Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shiftcited by 9
  10. 2024CRScore: Grounding Automated Evaluation of Code Review Comments in Code Claims and Smellscited by 8
  11. 2025LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLMcited by 8
  12. 2024Prompting and Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Automated Code Review Comment Generationcited by 7
35 more
  1. 2025The Art of Repair: Optimizing Iterative Program Repair with Instruction-Tuned Modelscited by 7
  2. 2025Combining Large Language Models with Static Analyzers for Code Review Generationcited by 6
  3. 2025Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Comment Generationcited by 6
  4. 2026AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Contextcited by 5
  5. 2026SWE-Review: Closing the Loop on Issue Resolution with Agentic Code Reviewcited by 5
  6. 2024exLong: Generating Exceptional Behavior Tests with Large Language Modelscited by 4
  7. 2024Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trendscited by 3
  8. 2025Towards Practical Defect-Focused Automated Code Reviewcited by 3
  9. 2026Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Reviewcited by 3
  10. 2026The End of Code Review: Coding Agents Supersede Human Inspectioncited by 3
  11. 2024Exploring the Integration of Large Language Models in Industrial Test Maintenance Processescited by 2
  12. 2025LAMS: LLM-Driven Automatic Mode Switching for Assistive Teleoperationcited by 2
  13. 2025Augmenting Large Language Models with Static Code Analysis for Automated Code Quality Improvementscited by 2
  14. 2025SAEL: Leveraging Large Language Models with Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detectioncited by 2
  15. 2025When More Retrieval Hurts: Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Generationcited by 2
  16. 2024On Unified Prompt Tuning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Reviewcited by 1
  17. 2024A GPT-based Code Review System for Programming Language Learningcited by 1
  18. 2025Analysis of Student-LLM Interaction in a Software Engineering Projectcited by 1
  19. 2025A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standardscited by 1
  20. 2025AI Assistants to Enhance and Exploit the PETSc Knowledge Basecited by 1
  21. 2025Previously on... Automating Code Reviewcited by 1
  22. 2025TREAT: A Code LLMs Trustworthiness / Reliability Evaluation and Testing Frameworkcited by 1
  23. 2026Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practicecited by 1
  24. 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Reviewcited by 1
  25. 2026Configuration Smells in AGENTS.md Files: Common Mistakes in Configuring Coding Agentscited by 1
  26. 2025Enhancing Code Consistency in AI Research with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
  27. 2025Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flawscited by 0
  28. 2025iPanda: An LLM-based Agent for Automated Conformance Testing of Communication Protocolscited by 0
  29. 2025A Note on Code Quality Score: LLMs for Maintainable Large Codebasescited by 0
  30. 2025On Assessing the Relevance of Code Reviews Authored by Generative Modelscited by 0
  31. 2026Towards Infinite Length Extrapolation: A Unified Approachcited by 0
  32. 2026ConceptRM: The Quest to Mitigate Alert Fatigue through Consensus-Based Purity-Driven Data Cleaning for Reflection Modellingcited by 0
  33. 2026Fine-grained Approaches for Confidence Calibration of LLMs in Automated Code Revisioncited by 0
  34. 2026Memorize Theorems, Not Instances: Probing SFT Generalization through Mathematical Reasoningcited by 0
  35. 2026Rethinking Training Data for Generating Code Review Commentscited by 0