LLaMA-Reviewer: Advancing Code Review Automation with Large Language Models through Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The automation of code review activities, a long-standing pursuit in software engineering, has been primarily addressed by numerous domain-specific pre-trained models. Despite their success, these models frequently demand extensive resources for pre-training from scratch. In contrast, Large Language Models (LLMs) provide an intriguing alternative, given their remarkable capabilities when supplemented with domain-specific knowledge. However, their potential for automating code review tasks remains largely unexplored. In response to this research gap, we present LLaMA-Reviewer, an innovative framework that leverages the capabilities of LLaMA, a popular LLM, in the realm of code review. Mindful of resource constraints, this framework employs parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, delivering high performance while using less than 1% of trainable parameters. An extensive evaluation of LLaMA-Reviewer is conducted on two diverse, publicly available datasets. Notably, even with the smallest LLaMA base model consisting of 6.7B parameters and a limited number of tuning epochs, LLaMA-Reviewer equals the performance of existing code-review-focused models. The ablation experiments provide insights into the influence of various fine-tuning process components, including input representation, instruction tuning, and different PEFT methods. To foster continuous progress in this field, the code and all PEFT-weight plugins have been made open-source.
Key facts. Cited by 47 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2023.
Builds on
35 of 68 references.
References · 35
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,711
23 more
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 906
- 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 885
- 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
- 2023StarCoder: may the source be with you!cited by 799
- 2023LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attentioncited by 781
- 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
- 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
- 2022InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesiscited by 498
- 2021Unified Pre-training for Program Understanding and Generationcited by 366
- 2023CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 333
- 2023Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpacacited by 305
- 2018SequenceR: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repaircited by 145
- 2018An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translationcited by 108
- 2022Automating Code Review Activities by Large-Scale Pre-trainingcited by 98
- 2022Using Pre-Trained Models to Boost Code Review Automationcited by 63
- 2021Towards Automating Code Review Activitiescited by 54
- 2019On Learning Meaningful Code Changes via Neural Machine Translationcited by 50
- 2022CoditT5: Pretraining for Source Code and Natural Language Editingcited by 45
- 2022AUGER: Automatically Generating Review Comments with Pre-training Modelscited by 23
- 2019CORE: Automating Review Recommendation for Code Changescited by 14
- 2022Modeling Review History for Reviewer Recommendation:A Hypergraph Approachcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 12; 2025: 21; 2026: 12.
47 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Exploring Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Codecited by 107
- 2023Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Codecited by 62
- 2023RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repaircited by 50
- 2024Low-Rank Adaptation for Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 37
- 2024CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Reviewcited by 34
- 2024Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning: A Comprehensive Analysis Across Applicationscited by 25
- 2024Software Vulnerability and Functionality Assessment using LLMscited by 11
- 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysiscited by 11
- 2025Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shiftcited by 9
- 2024CRScore: Grounding Automated Evaluation of Code Review Comments in Code Claims and Smellscited by 8
- 2025LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLMcited by 8
- 2024Prompting and Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Automated Code Review Comment Generationcited by 7
35 more
- 2025The Art of Repair: Optimizing Iterative Program Repair with Instruction-Tuned Modelscited by 7
- 2025Combining Large Language Models with Static Analyzers for Code Review Generationcited by 6
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Comment Generationcited by 6
- 2026AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Contextcited by 5
- 2026SWE-Review: Closing the Loop on Issue Resolution with Agentic Code Reviewcited by 5
- 2024exLong: Generating Exceptional Behavior Tests with Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trendscited by 3
- 2025Towards Practical Defect-Focused Automated Code Reviewcited by 3
- 2026Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Reviewcited by 3
- 2026The End of Code Review: Coding Agents Supersede Human Inspectioncited by 3
- 2024Exploring the Integration of Large Language Models in Industrial Test Maintenance Processescited by 2
- 2025LAMS: LLM-Driven Automatic Mode Switching for Assistive Teleoperationcited by 2
- 2025Augmenting Large Language Models with Static Code Analysis for Automated Code Quality Improvementscited by 2
- 2025SAEL: Leveraging Large Language Models with Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detectioncited by 2
- 2025When More Retrieval Hurts: Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Generationcited by 2
- 2024On Unified Prompt Tuning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Reviewcited by 1
- 2024A GPT-based Code Review System for Programming Language Learningcited by 1
- 2025Analysis of Student-LLM Interaction in a Software Engineering Projectcited by 1
- 2025A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standardscited by 1
- 2025AI Assistants to Enhance and Exploit the PETSc Knowledge Basecited by 1
- 2025Previously on... Automating Code Reviewcited by 1
- 2025TREAT: A Code LLMs Trustworthiness / Reliability Evaluation and Testing Frameworkcited by 1
- 2026Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practicecited by 1
- 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Reviewcited by 1
- 2026Configuration Smells in AGENTS.md Files: Common Mistakes in Configuring Coding Agentscited by 1
- 2025Enhancing Code Consistency in AI Research with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2025Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flawscited by 0
- 2025iPanda: An LLM-based Agent for Automated Conformance Testing of Communication Protocolscited by 0
- 2025A Note on Code Quality Score: LLMs for Maintainable Large Codebasescited by 0
- 2025On Assessing the Relevance of Code Reviews Authored by Generative Modelscited by 0
- 2026Towards Infinite Length Extrapolation: A Unified Approachcited by 0
- 2026ConceptRM: The Quest to Mitigate Alert Fatigue through Consensus-Based Purity-Driven Data Cleaning for Reflection Modellingcited by 0
- 2026Fine-grained Approaches for Confidence Calibration of LLMs in Automated Code Revisioncited by 0
- 2026Memorize Theorems, Not Instances: Probing SFT Generalization through Mathematical Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Rethinking Training Data for Generating Code Review Commentscited by 0
- 2026Rethinking Training Data for Generating Code Review Comments28 Jul 2026
- 2026SWE-Review: Closing the Loop on Issue Resolution with Agentic Code Review7 Jul 2026
- 2026Configuration Smells in AGENTS.md Files: Common Mistakes in Configuring Coding Agents14 Jun 2026
- 2026The End of Code Review: Coding Agents Supersede Human Inspection11 Jun 2026
- 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review17 May 2026
- 2026Memorize Theorems, Not Instances: Probing SFT Generalization through Mathematical Reasoning10 May 2026
- 2026Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practice27 Apr 2026
- 2026Fine-grained Approaches for Confidence Calibration of LLMs in Automated Code Revision8 Apr 2026
- 2026Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review19 Mar 2026
- 2026ConceptRM: The Quest to Mitigate Alert Fatigue through Consensus-Based Purity-Driven Data Cleaning for Reflection Modelling9 Feb 2026
- 2026AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Context27 Jan 2026
- 2026Towards Infinite Length Extrapolation: A Unified Approach3 Jan 2026
35 more
- 2025On Assessing the Relevance of Code Reviews Authored by Generative Models17 Dec 2025
- 2025LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLM1 Dec 2025
- 2025When More Retrieval Hurts: Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Generation7 Nov 2025
- 2025TREAT: A Code LLMs Trustworthiness / Reliability Evaluation and Testing Framework20 Oct 2025
- 2025Previously on... Automating Code Review25 Aug 2025
- 2025A Note on Code Quality Score: LLMs for Maintainable Large Codebases1 Aug 2025
- 2025SAEL: Leveraging Large Language Models with Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection30 Jul 2025
- 2025iPanda: An LLM-based Agent for Automated Conformance Testing of Communication Protocols1 Jul 2025
- 2025AI Assistants to Enhance and Exploit the PETSc Knowledge Base25 Jun 2025
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Comment Generation13 Jun 2025
- 2025Augmenting Large Language Models with Static Code Analysis for Automated Code Quality Improvements12 Jun 2025
- 2025Towards Practical Defect-Focused Automated Code Review23 May 2025
- 2025A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standards19 May 2025
- 2025The Art of Repair: Optimizing Iterative Program Repair with Instruction-Tuned Models5 May 2025
- 2025Improving Automated Secure Code Reviews: A Synthetic Dataset for Code Vulnerability Flaws22 Apr 2025
- 2025Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shift12 Feb 2025
- 2025Combining Large Language Models with Static Analyzers for Code Review Generation10 Feb 2025
- 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysis5 Feb 2025
- 2025Analysis of Student-LLM Interaction in a Software Engineering Project3 Feb 2025
- 2025Enhancing Code Consistency in AI Research with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation2 Feb 2025
- 2025LAMS: LLM-Driven Automatic Mode Switching for Assistive Teleoperation15 Jan 2025
- 2024Low-Rank Adaptation for Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Review31 Dec 2024
- 2024Prompting and Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Automated Code Review Comment Generation15 Nov 2024
- 2024CRScore: Grounding Automated Evaluation of Code Review Comments in Code Claims and Smells29 Sep 2024
- 2024Exploring the Integration of Large Language Models in Industrial Test Maintenance Processes10 Sep 2024
- 2024A GPT-based Code Review System for Programming Language Learning21 Jun 2024
- 2024exLong: Generating Exceptional Behavior Tests with Large Language Models23 May 2024
- 2024Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning: A Comprehensive Analysis Across Applications21 Apr 2024
- 2024On Unified Prompt Tuning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review11 Apr 2024
- 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Exploring Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Code1 Apr 2024
- 2024Software Vulnerability and Functionality Assessment using LLMs13 Mar 2024
- 2024CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Review3 Feb 2024
- 2024Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trends15 Jan 2024
- 2023RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repair25 Dec 2023
- 2023Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Code14 Nov 2023
- 2024CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Reviewcited by 34
- 2026SWE-Review: Closing the Loop on Issue Resolution with Agentic Code Reviewcited by 5
- 2026The End of Code Review: Coding Agents Supersede Human Inspectioncited by 3
- 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Reviewcited by 1
- 2026Configuration Smells in AGENTS.md Files: Common Mistakes in Configuring Coding Agentscited by 1
- 2025iPanda: An LLM-based Agent for Automated Conformance Testing of Communication Protocolscited by 0
- 2026SWE-Review: Closing the Loop on Issue Resolution with Agentic Code Review7 Jul 2026
- 2026Configuration Smells in AGENTS.md Files: Common Mistakes in Configuring Coding Agents14 Jun 2026
- 2026The End of Code Review: Coding Agents Supersede Human Inspection11 Jun 2026
- 2026Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review17 May 2026
- 2025iPanda: An LLM-based Agent for Automated Conformance Testing of Communication Protocols1 Jul 2025
- 2024CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Review3 Feb 2024
- 2025LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLMcited by 8
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Comment Generationcited by 6
- 2025When More Retrieval Hurts: Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Generationcited by 2
- 2025Enhancing Code Consistency in AI Research with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2025LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLM1 Dec 2025
- 2025When More Retrieval Hurts: Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Generation7 Nov 2025
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Code Review Comment Generation13 Jun 2025
- 2025Enhancing Code Consistency in AI Research with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation2 Feb 2025
- 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Exploring Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Codecited by 107
- 2023Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Codecited by 62
- 2023RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repaircited by 50
- 2024Low-Rank Adaptation for Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 37
- 2024Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning: A Comprehensive Analysis Across Applicationscited by 25
- 2024Software Vulnerability and Functionality Assessment using LLMscited by 11
- 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysiscited by 11
- 2025Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shiftcited by 9
- 2024CRScore: Grounding Automated Evaluation of Code Review Comments in Code Claims and Smellscited by 8
- 2024Prompting and Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Automated Code Review Comment Generationcited by 7
- 2025The Art of Repair: Optimizing Iterative Program Repair with Instruction-Tuned Modelscited by 7
- 2025Combining Large Language Models with Static Analyzers for Code Review Generationcited by 6
12 most cited of 33 All 33 (JSON)
- 2026Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practice27 Apr 2026
- 2026Fine-grained Approaches for Confidence Calibration of LLMs in Automated Code Revision8 Apr 2026
- 2026Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review19 Mar 2026
- 2026ConceptRM: The Quest to Mitigate Alert Fatigue through Consensus-Based Purity-Driven Data Cleaning for Reflection Modelling9 Feb 2026
- 2026AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Context27 Jan 2026
- 2026Towards Infinite Length Extrapolation: A Unified Approach3 Jan 2026
- 2025On Assessing the Relevance of Code Reviews Authored by Generative Models17 Dec 2025
- 2025TREAT: A Code LLMs Trustworthiness / Reliability Evaluation and Testing Framework20 Oct 2025
- 2025Previously on... Automating Code Review25 Aug 2025
- 2025A Note on Code Quality Score: LLMs for Maintainable Large Codebases1 Aug 2025
- 2025AI Assistants to Enhance and Exploit the PETSc Knowledge Base25 Jun 2025
- 2025Augmenting Large Language Models with Static Code Analysis for Automated Code Quality Improvements12 Jun 2025
12 newest of 33 All 33 (JSON)