Imputing Brain Measurements Across Data Sets via Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Publicly available data sets of structural MRIs might not contain specific measurements of brain Regions of Interests (ROIs) that are important for training machine learning models. For example, the curvature scores computed by Freesurfer are not released by the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. One can address this issue by simply reapplying Freesurfer to the data set. However, this approach is generally computationally and labor intensive (e.g., requiring quality control). An alternative is to impute the missing measurements via a deep learning approach. However, the state-of-the-art is designed to estimate randomly missing values rather than entire measurements. We therefore propose to re-frame the imputation problem as a prediction task on another (public) data set that contains the missing measurements and shares some ROI measurements with the data sets of interest. A deep learning model is then trained to predict the missing measurements from the shared ones and afterwards is applied to the other data sets. Our proposed algorithm models the dependencies between ROI measurements via a graph neural network (GNN) and accounts for demographic differences in brain measurements (e.g. sex) by feeding the graph encoding into a parallel architecture. The architecture simultaneously optimizes a graph decoder to impute values and a classifier in predicting demographic factors. We test the approach, called Demographic Aware Graph-based Imputation (DAGI), on imputing those missing Freesurfer measurements of ABCD (N=3760) by training the predictor on those publicly released by the National Consortium on Alcohol and Neurodevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA, N=540)...
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2023.
Builds on
6 of 30 references.
References · 6
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
- 2021Understanding Pooling in Graph Neural Networkscited by 69
- 2019Missing Data Imputation with Adversarially-trained Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 54
- 2022Deep Neural Imputation: A Framework for Recovering Incomplete Brain Recordingscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.