mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Utility of the Virtual Imaging Trials Methodology for Objective Characterization of AI Systems and Training Data

arXiv 2308.09730 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2023eess.IV cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: The credibility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models for medical imaging continues to be a challenge, affected by the diversity of models, the data used to train the models, and applicability of their combination to produce reproducible results for new data. In this work, we aimed to explore whether emerging Virtual Imaging Trials (VIT) methodologies can provide an objective resource to approach this challenge. Approach: The study was conducted for the case example of COVID-19 diagnosis using clinical and virtual computed tomography (CT) and chest radiography (CXR) processed with convolutional neural networks. Multiple AI models were developed and tested using 3D ResNet-like and 2D EfficientNetv2 architectures across diverse datasets. Results: Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and the DeLong method for AUC confidence intervals. The models trained on the most diverse datasets showed the highest external testing performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.73-0.76 for CT and 0.70-0.73 for CXR. Internal testing yielded higher AUC values (0.77-0.85 for CT and 0.77-1.0 for CXR), highlighting a substantial drop in performance during external validation, which underscores the importance of diverse and comprehensive training and testing data. Most notably, the VIT approach provided objective assessment of the utility of diverse models and datasets, while offering insight into the influence of dataset characteristics, patient factors, and imaging physics on AI efficacy. Conclusions: The VIT approach enhances model transparency and reliability, offering nuanced insights into the factors driving AI performance and bridging the gap between experimental and clinical settings.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2023.

Builds on

13 of 68 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
  3. 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
  4. 2020COVID-Net: A Tailored Deep Convolutional Neural Network Design for Detection of COVID-19 Cases from Chest X-Ray Imagescited by 264
  5. 2020Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scanscited by 158
  6. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  7. 2020BIMCV COVID-19+: a large annotated dataset of RX and CT images from COVID-19 patientscited by 81
  8. 2020COVIDNet-CT: A Tailored Deep Convolutional Neural Network Design for Detection of COVID-19 Cases from Chest CT Imagescited by 39
  9. 2020COVID-CAPS: A Capsule Network-based Framework for Identification of COVID-19 cases from X-ray Imagescited by 34
  10. 2020Classification of Multiple Diseases on Body CT Scans using Weakly Supervised Deep Learningcited by 13
  11. 2021Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT images: model generalizabilitycited by 5
  12. 2022Virtual vs. Reality: External Validation of COVID-19 Classifiers using XCAT Phantoms for Chest Computed Tomographycited by 3
1 more
  1. 2022Co-occurring Diseases Heavily Influence the Performance of Weakly Supervised Learning Models for Classification of Chest CTcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.