mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT images: model generalizability

arXiv 2102.09616 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2021physics.med-ph cs.LG eess.IVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, worldwide research efforts have focused on using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on various medical data of COVID-19-positive patients in order to identify or classify various aspects of the disease, with promising reported results. However, concerns have been raised over their generalizability, given the heterogeneous factors in training datasets. This study aims to examine the severity of this problem by evaluating deep learning (DL) classification models trained to identify COVID-19-positive patients on 3D computed tomography (CT) datasets from different countries. We collected one dataset at UT Southwestern (UTSW), and three external datasets from different countries: CC-CCII Dataset (China), COVID-CTset (Iran), and MosMedData (Russia). We divided the data into 2 classes: COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients. We trained nine identical DL-based classification models by using combinations of the datasets with a 72% train, 8% validation, and 20% test data split. The models trained on a single dataset achieved accuracy/area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values of 0.87/0.826 (UTSW), 0.97/0.988 (CC-CCCI), and 0.86/0.873 (COVID-CTset) when evaluated on their own dataset. The models trained on multiple datasets and evaluated on a test set from one of the datasets used for training performed better. However, the performance dropped close to an AUC of 0.5 (random guess) for all models when evaluated on a different dataset outside of its training datasets. Including the MosMedData, which only contained positive labels, into the training did not necessarily help the performance on the other datasets. Multiple factors likely contribute to these results, such as patient demographics and differences in image acquisition or reconstruction, causing a data shift among different study cohorts.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2021.

Builds on

12 of 45 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  4. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
  5. 2020COVID-Net: A Tailored Deep Convolutional Neural Network Design for Detection of COVID-19 Cases from Chest X-Ray Imagescited by 264
  6. 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 261
  7. 2020MosMedData: Chest CT Scans With COVID-19 Related Findings Datasetcited by 103
  8. 2020Covid-19: Automatic detection from X-Ray images utilizing Transfer Learning with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 92
  9. 2020Automatic Detection of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Using X-ray Images and Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 86
  10. 2020Deep Learning COVID-19 Features on CXR using Limited Training Data Setscited by 68
  11. 2020COVIDX-Net: A Framework of Deep Learning Classifiers to Diagnose COVID-19 in X-Ray Imagescited by 60
  12. 2020Contrastive Cross-site Learning with Redesigned Net for COVID-19 CT Classificationcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 1.

5 papers.