mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable Graph Neural Networks for Tabular Data

arXiv 2308.08945 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data in tabular format is frequently occurring in real-world applications. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have recently been extended to effectively handle such data, allowing feature interactions to be captured through representation learning. However, these approaches essentially produce black-box models, in the form of deep neural networks, precluding users from following the logic behind the model predictions. We propose an approach, called IGNNet (Interpretable Graph Neural Network for tabular data), which constrains the learning algorithm to produce an interpretable model, where the model shows how the predictions are exactly computed from the original input features. A large-scale empirical investigation is presented, showing that IGNNet is performing on par with state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms that target tabular data, including XGBoost, Random Forests, and TabNet. At the same time, the results show that the explanations obtained from IGNNet are aligned with the true Shapley values of the features without incurring any additional computational overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2023.

Builds on

28 of 53 references.

References · 28

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  6. 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
  7. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  8. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  9. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  10. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
  11. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  12. 2020Design Space for Graph Neural Networkscited by 182
16 more
  1. 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 153
  2. 2021FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value Estimationcited by 123
  3. 2021ProtGNN: Towards Self-Explaining Graph Neural Networkscited by 96
  4. 2022Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Conceptscited by 79
  5. 2021Towards Self-Explainable Graph Neural Networkcited by 75
  6. 2022Interpretable Graph Neural Networks for Connectome-Based Brain Disorder Analysiscited by 58
  7. 2017Interpretable & Explorable Approximations of Black Box Modelscited by 54
  8. 2022KerGNNs: Interpretable Graph Neural Networks with Graph Kernelscited by 50
  9. 2021Boost then Convolve: Gradient Boosting Meets Graph Neural Networkscited by 42
  10. 2021Lipschitz Normalization for Self-Attention Layers with Application to Graph Neural Networkscited by 38
  11. 2021TabularNet: A Neural Network Architecture for Understanding Semantic Structures of Tabular Datacited by 36
  12. 2022Global Concept-Based Interpretability for Graph Neural Networks via Neuron Analysiscited by 32
  13. 2021TabGNN: Multiplex Graph Neural Network for Tabular Data Predictioncited by 26
  14. 2017Contextual Explanation Networkscited by 21
  15. 2022VCNet: A self-explaining model for realistic counterfactual generationcited by 20
  16. 2021LocalGLMnet: interpretable deep learning for tabular datacited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.