Fast and Multiphase Rates for Nearest Neighbor Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the scaling of classification error rates with respect to the size of the training dataset. In contrast to classical results where rates are minimax optimal for a problem class, this work starts with the empirical observation that, even for a fixed data distribution, the error scaling can have diverse rates across different ranges of sample size. To understand when and why the error rate is non-uniform, we theoretically analyze nearest neighbor classifiers. We show that an error scaling law can have fine-grained rates: in the early phase, the test error depends polynomially on the data dimension and decreases fast; whereas in the later phase, the error depends exponentially on the data dimension and decreases slowly. Our analysis highlights the complexity of the data distribution in determining the test error. When the data are distributed benignly, we show that the generalization error of nearest neighbor classifier can depend polynomially, instead of exponentially, on the data dimension.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2023.
Builds on
27 of 73 references.
References · 27
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 431
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 309
- 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
- 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
- 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
15 more
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
- 2020Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Lossescited by 172
- 2018Regularization Matters: Generalization and Optimization of Neural Nets v.s. their Induced Kernelcited by 131
- 2018Marginal Singularity, and the Benefits of Labels in Covariate-Shiftcited by 65
- 2014Rates of Convergence for Nearest Neighbor Classificationcited by 45
- 2018The phase transition for the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate in high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 45
- 2021Towards a Unified Information-Theoretic Framework for Generalizationcited by 29
- 2020Universal consistency and rates of convergence of multiclass prototype algorithms in metric spacescited by 18
- 2017Local nearest neighbour classification with applications to semi-supervised learningcited by 17
- 2023On the sample complexity of parameter estimation in logistic regression with normal designcited by 13
- 2017Achieving the time of 1-NN, but the accuracy of k-NNcited by 10
- 2020On Convergence of Nearest Neighbor Classifiers over Feature Transformationscited by 7
- 2020Functions with average smoothness: structure, algorithms, and learningcited by 6
- 2015Nearly optimal classification for semimetricscited by 4
- 2023Near-optimal learning with average H"older smoothnesscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.