Why Not? Explaining Missing Entailments with Evee (Technical Report)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding logical entailments derived by a description logic reasoner is not always straight-forward for ontology users. For this reason, various methods for explaining entailments using justifications and proofs have been developed and implemented as plug-ins for the ontology editor Prot'eg'e. However, when the user expects a missing consequence to hold, it is equally important to explain why it does not follow from the ontology. In this paper, we describe a new version of rm Escriptsize VEE, a Prot'eg'e plugin that now also provides explanations for missing consequences, via existing and new techniques based on abduction and counterexamples.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2023.
Builds on
6 of 25 references.
References · 6
- 2020Signature-Based Abduction for Expressive Description Logics -- Technical Reportcited by 9
- 2020Finding Small Proofs for Description Logic Entailments: Theory and Practice (Extended Technical Report)cited by 7
- 2021Finding Good Proofs for Description Logic Entailments Using Recursive Quality Measures (Extended Technical Report)cited by 7
- 2021Signature-Based Abduction with Fresh Individuals and Complex Concepts for Description Logics (Extended Version)cited by 5
- 2022Connection-minimal Abduction in EL via Translation to FOL -- Technical Reportcited by 5
- 2022On the Eve of True Explainability for OWL Ontologies: Description Logic Proofs with Evee and Evonne (Extended Version)cited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.