mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Signature-Based Abduction with Fresh Individuals and Complex Concepts for Description Logics (Extended Version)

arXiv 2105.00274 ↗First posted 1 May 2021cs.AI cs.LOcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given a knowledge base and an observation as a set of facts, ABox abduction aims at computing a hypothesis that, when added to the knowledge base, is sufficient to entail the observation. In signature-based ABox abduction, the hypothesis is further required to use only names from a given set. This form of abduction has applications such as diagnosis, KB repair, or explaining missing entailments. It is possible that hypotheses for a given observation only exist if we admit the use of fresh individuals and/or complex concepts built from the given signature, something most approaches for ABox abduction so far do not support or only support with restrictions. In this paper, we investigate the computational complexity of this form of abduction -- allowing either fresh individuals, complex concepts, or both -- for various description logics, and give size bounds on the hypotheses if they exist.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2021.

Builds on

2 of 36 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Signature-Based Abduction for Expressive Description Logics -- Technical Reportcited by 9
  2. 2014Reasoning about Explanations for Negative Query Answers in DL-Litecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

5 papers.