mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Introducing Hybrid Modeling with Time-series-Transformers: A Comparative Study of Series and Parallel Approach in Batch Crystallization

arXiv 2308.05749 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2023physics.chem-ph cs.LG cs.SYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing digital twins rely on data-driven black-box models, predominantly using deep neural recurrent, and convolutional neural networks (DNNs, RNNs, and CNNs) to capture the dynamics of chemical systems. However, these models have not seen the light of day, given the hesitance of directly deploying a black-box tool in practice due to safety and operational issues. To tackle this conundrum, hybrid models combining first-principles physics-based dynamics with machine learning (ML) models have increased in popularity as they are considered a 'best of both worlds' approach. That said, existing simple DNN models are not adept at long-term time-series predictions and utilizing contextual information on the trajectory of the process dynamics. Recently, attention-based time-series transformers (TSTs) that leverage multi-headed attention mechanism and positional encoding to capture long-term and short-term changes in process states have shown high predictive performance. Thus, a first-of-a-kind, TST-based hybrid framework has been developed for batch crystallization, demonstrating improved accuracy and interpretability compared to traditional black-box models. Specifically, two different configurations (i.e., series and parallel) of TST-based hybrid models are constructed and compared, which show a normalized-mean-square-error (NMSE) in the range of [10, 50]×10-4 and an R2 value over 0.99. Given the growing adoption of digital twins, next-generation attention-based hybrid models are expected to play a crucial role in shaping the future of chemical manufacturing.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2023.

Builds on

16 of 78 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
  5. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 489
  6. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 220
  7. 2017Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limitcited by 139
  8. 2021A physics-informed variational DeepONet for predicting the crack path in brittle materialscited by 98
  9. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 75
  10. 2020The Depth-to-Width Interplay in Self-Attentioncited by 39
  11. 2022Learning from flowsheets: A generative transformer model for autocompletion of flowsheetscited by 10
  12. 2019Lipschitz Constrained Parameter Initialization for Deep Transformerscited by 9
4 more
  1. 2021Data-Centric Engineering: integrating simulation, machine learning and statistics. Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 7
  2. 2023Machine Learning Benchmarks for the Classification of Equivalent Circuit Models from Electrochemical Impedance Spectracited by 7
  3. 2023CrystalGPT: Enhancing system-to-system transferability in crystallization prediction and control using time-series-transformerscited by 4
  4. 2023Require Process Control? LSTMc is all you need!cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.