CrystalGPT: Enhancing system-to-system transferability in crystallization prediction and control using time-series-transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For prediction and real-time control tasks, machine-learning (ML)-based digital twins are frequently employed. However, while these models are typically accurate, they are custom-designed for individual systems, making system-to-system (S2S) transferability difficult. This occurs even when substantial similarities exist in the process dynamics across different chemical systems. To address this challenge, we developed a novel time-series-transformer (TST) framework that exploits the powerful transfer learning capabilities inherent in transformer algorithms. This was demonstrated using readily available process data obtained from different crystallizers operating under various operational scenarios. Using this extensive dataset, we trained a TST model (CrystalGPT) to exhibit remarkable S2S transferability not only across all pre-established systems, but also to an unencountered system. CrystalGPT achieved a cumulative error across all systems, which is eight times superior to that of existing ML models. Additionally, we coupled CrystalGPT with a predictive controller to reduce the variance in setpoint tracking to just 1%.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2023.
Builds on
17 of 73 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,868
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
- 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
- 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 406
- 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 222
- 2017Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limitcited by 140
- 2021A physics-informed variational DeepONet for predicting the crack path in brittle materialscited by 98
5 more
- 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 76
- 2020The Depth-to-Width Interplay in Self-Attentioncited by 42
- 2022Learning from flowsheets: A generative transformer model for autocompletion of flowsheetscited by 10
- 2014Adaptation Algorithm and Theory Based on Generalized Discrepancycited by 9
- 2019Lipschitz Constrained Parameter Initialization for Deep Transformerscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Generative AI and Process Systems Engineering: The Next Frontiercited by 9
- 2023Introducing Hybrid Modeling with Time-series-Transformers: A Comparative Study of Series and Parallel Approach in Batch Crystallizationcited by 5
- 2023Exploring Different Time-series-Transformer (TST) Architectures: A Case Study in Battery Life Prediction for Electric Vehicles (EVs)cited by 1
- 2023Optimizing the switching operation in monoclonal antibody production: Economic MPC and reinforcement learningcited by 0
- 2024Generative AI and Process Systems Engineering: The Next Frontier15 Feb 2024
- 2023Optimizing the switching operation in monoclonal antibody production: Economic MPC and reinforcement learning7 Aug 2023
- 2023Exploring Different Time-series-Transformer (TST) Architectures: A Case Study in Battery Life Prediction for Electric Vehicles (EVs)7 Aug 2023
- 2023Introducing Hybrid Modeling with Time-series-Transformers: A Comparative Study of Series and Parallel Approach in Batch Crystallization25 Jul 2023