Single-Sentence Reader: A Novel Approach for Addressing Answer Position Bias
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) models tend to take advantage of spurious correlations (also known as dataset bias or annotation artifacts in the research community). Consequently, these models may perform the MRC task without fully comprehending the given context and question, which is undesirable since it may result in low robustness against distribution shift. The main focus of this paper is answer-position bias, where a significant percentage of training questions have answers located solely in the first sentence of the context. We propose a Single-Sentence Reader as a new approach for addressing answer position bias in MRC. Remarkably, in our experiments with six different models, our proposed Single-Sentence Readers trained on biased dataset achieve results that nearly match those of models trained on normal dataset, proving their effectiveness in addressing the answer position bias. Our study also discusses several challenges our Single-Sentence Readers encounter and proposes a potential solution.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2023.
Builds on
30 of 44 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
- 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
18 more
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
- 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
- 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
- 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
- 2020Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 131
- 2017Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehensioncited by 120
- 2020The Effect of Natural Distribution Shift on Question Answering Modelscited by 104
- 2021Decontextualization: Making Sentences Stand-Alonecited by 101
- 2020Look at the First Sentence: Position Bias in Question Answeringcited by 83
- 2018What Makes Reading Comprehension Questions Easier?cited by 59
- 2020Challenges in Information-Seeking QA: Unanswerable Questions and Paragraph Retrievalcited by 44
- 2021Why Machine Reading Comprehension Models Learn Shortcuts?cited by 40
- 2022Can Rationalization Improve Robustness?cited by 36
- 2020Improving the Robustness of QA Models to Challenge Sets with Variational Question-Answer Pair Generationcited by 10
- 2022Which Shortcut Solution Do Question Answering Models Prefer to Learn?cited by 9
- 2021FQuAD2.0: French Question Answering and knowing that you know nothingcited by 7
- 2022VLSP 2021 - ViMRC Challenge: Vietnamese Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 7
- 2023The Impacts of Unanswerable Questions on the Robustness of Machine Reading Comprehension Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.