mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Application-Oriented Benchmarking of Quantum Generative Learning Using QUARK

arXiv 2308.04082 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2023quant-ph cs.DC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Benchmarking of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms is challenging due to the complexity and variability of QML systems, e.g., regarding model ansatzes, data sets, training techniques, and hyper-parameters selection. The QUantum computing Application benchmaRK (QUARK) framework simplifies and standardizes benchmarking studies for quantum computing applications. Here, we propose several extensions of QUARK to include the ability to evaluate the training and deployment of quantum generative models. We describe the updated software architecture and illustrate its flexibility through several example applications: (1) We trained different quantum generative models using several circuit ansatzes, data sets, and data transformations. (2) We evaluated our models on GPU and real quantum hardware. (3) We assessed the generalization capabilities of our generative models using a broad set of metrics that capture, e.g., the novelty and validity of the generated data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2023.

Builds on

18 of 53 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  4. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 925
  5. 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 401
  6. 2018Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measurescited by 224
  7. 2019MLPerf Inference Benchmarkcited by 195
  8. 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 193
  9. 2018Quantum generative adversarial networkscited by 128
  10. 2021Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developmentscited by 121
  11. 2021Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design: A Reviewcited by 103
  12. 2021Enhancing Generative Models via Quantum Correlationscited by 40
6 more
  1. 2017Information Perspective to Probabilistic Modeling: Boltzmann Machines versus Born Machinescited by 33
  2. 2021Quantum machine learning with differential privacycited by 30
  3. 2022Benchmarking Adversarially Robust Quantum Machine Learning at Scalecited by 28
  4. 2022Do Quantum Circuit Born Machines Generalize?cited by 19
  5. 2022SupermarQ: A Scalable Quantum Benchmark Suitecited by 14
  6. 2019XACC: A System-Level Software Infrastructure for Heterogeneous Quantum-Classical Computingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.