mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Why We Don't Have AGI Yet

arXiv 2308.03598 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2023cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The original vision of AI was re-articulated in 2002 via the term 'Artificial General Intelligence' or AGI. This vision is to build 'Thinking Machines' - computer systems that can learn, reason, and solve problems similar to the way humans do. This is in stark contrast to the 'Narrow AI' approach practiced by almost everyone in the field over the many decades. While several large-scale efforts have nominally been working on AGI (most notably DeepMind), the field of pure focused AGI development has not been well funded or promoted. This is surprising given the fantastic value that true AGI can bestow on humanity. In addition to the dearth of effort in this field, there are also several theoretical and methodical missteps that are hampering progress. We highlight why purely statistical approaches are unlikely to lead to AGI, and identify several crucial cognitive abilities required to achieve human-like adaptability and autonomous learning. We conclude with a survey of socio-technical factors that have undoubtedly slowed progress towards AGI.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2023.

Builds on

4 of 20 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  2. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  3. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
  4. 2016The AGI Containment Problemcited by 36

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.