mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Partial identification of kernel based two sample tests with mismeasured data

arXiv 2308.03570 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nonparametric two-sample tests such as the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) are often used to detect differences between two distributions in machine learning applications. However, the majority of existing literature assumes that error-free samples from the two distributions of interest are available.We relax this assumption and study the estimation of the MMD under ε-contamination, where a possibly non-random ε proportion of one distribution is erroneously grouped with the other. We show that under ε-contamination, the typical estimate of the MMD is unreliable. Instead, we study partial identification of the MMD, and characterize sharp upper and lower bounds that contain the true, unknown MMD. We propose a method to estimate these bounds, and show that it gives estimates that converge to the sharpest possible bounds on the MMD as sample size increases, with a convergence rate that is faster than alternative approaches. Using three datasets, we empirically validate that our approach is superior to the alternatives: it gives tight bounds with a low false coverage rate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2023.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  2. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  3. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  4. 2017MMD GAN: Towards Deeper Understanding of Moment Matching Networkcited by 251
  5. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  6. 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
  7. 2019Distributionally Robust Optimization and Generalization in Kernel Methodscited by 73
  8. 2016Interpretable Distribution Features with Maximum Testing Powercited by 63
  9. 2020Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimizationcited by 60
  10. 2021Causally motivated Shortcut Removal Using Auxiliary Labelscited by 55
  11. 2019Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matchingcited by 36
  12. 2022Efficient Aggregated Kernel Tests using Incomplete U-statisticscited by 27
4 more
  1. 2023Compress Then Test: Powerful Kernel Testing in Near-linear Timecited by 14
  2. 2022Fairness and robustness in anti-causal predictioncited by 10
  3. 2021Learning Invariant Representations with Missing Datacited by 4
  4. 2019A Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space log-rank test for the two-sample problemcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.