Deep Policy Gradient Methods in Commodity Markets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The energy transition has increased the reliance on intermittent energy sources, destabilizing energy markets and causing unprecedented volatility, culminating in the global energy crisis of 2021. In addition to harming producers and consumers, volatile energy markets may jeopardize vital decarbonization efforts. Traders play an important role in stabilizing markets by providing liquidity and reducing volatility. Several mathematical and statistical models have been proposed for forecasting future returns. However, developing such models is non-trivial due to financial markets' low signal-to-noise ratios and nonstationary dynamics. This thesis investigates the effectiveness of deep reinforcement learning methods in commodities trading. It formalizes the commodities trading problem as a continuing discrete-time stochastic dynamical system. This system employs a novel time-discretization scheme that is reactive and adaptive to market volatility, providing better statistical properties for the sub-sampled financial time series. Two policy gradient algorithms, an actor-based and an actor-critic-based, are proposed for optimizing a transaction-cost- and risk-sensitive trading agent. The agent maps historical price observations to market positions through parametric function approximators utilizing deep neural network architectures, specifically CNNs and LSTMs. On average, the deep reinforcement learning models produce an 83 percent higher Sharpe ratio than the buy-and-hold baseline when backtested on front-month natural gas futures from 2017 to 2022. The backtests demonstrate that the risk tolerance of the deep reinforcement learning agents can be adjusted using a risk-sensitivity term. The actor-based policy gradient algorithm performs significantly better than the actor-critic-based algorithm, and the CNN-based models perform slightly better than those based on the LSTM.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.
Builds on
17 of 81 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 734
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
- 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 465
5 more
- 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 162
- 2017A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problemcited by 128
- 2018Practical Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Stock Tradingcited by 49
- 2018Forecasting Economics and Financial Time Series: ARIMA vs. LSTMcited by 33
- 2018Financial Trading as a Game: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023Commodities Trading through Deep Policy Gradient Methodscited by 0
- 2023Commodities Trading through Deep Policy Gradient Methods10 Aug 2023