Evaluation of network-guided random forest for disease gene discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gene network information is believed to be beneficial for disease module and pathway identification, but has not been explicitly utilized in the standard random forest (RF) algorithm for gene expression data analysis. We investigate the performance of a network-guided RF where the network information is summarized into a sampling probability of predictor variables which is further used in the construction of the RF. Our results suggest that network-guided RF does not provide better disease prediction than the standard RF. In terms of disease gene discovery, if disease genes form module(s), network-guided RF identifies them more accurately. In addition, when disease status is independent from genes in the given network, spurious gene selection results can occur when using network information, especially on hub genes. Our empirical analysis on two balanced microarray and RNA-Seq breast cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for classification of progesterone receptor (PR) status also demonstrates that network-guided RF can identify genes from PGR-related pathways, which leads to a better connected module of identified genes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2023.
Builds on
2 of 40 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.