mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Center Contrastive Loss for Metric Learning

arXiv 2308.00458 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive learning is a major studied topic in metric learning. However, sampling effective contrastive pairs remains a challenge due to factors such as limited batch size, imbalanced data distribution, and the risk of overfitting. In this paper, we propose a novel metric learning function called Center Contrastive Loss, which maintains a class-wise center bank and compares the category centers with the query data points using a contrastive loss. The center bank is updated in real-time to boost model convergence without the need for well-designed sample mining. The category centers are well-optimized classification proxies to re-balance the supervisory signal of each class. Furthermore, the proposed loss combines the advantages of both contrastive and classification methods by reducing intra-class variations and enhancing inter-class differences to improve the discriminative power of embeddings. Our experimental results, as shown in Figure 1, demonstrate that a standard network (ResNet50) trained with our loss achieves state-of-the-art performance and faster convergence.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.

Builds on

46 of 64 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  7. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  8. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  9. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  10. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
  11. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
  12. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
34 more
  1. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  2. 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 402
  3. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  4. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  5. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
  6. 2016Large-Margin Softmax Loss for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 296
  7. 2018Learning Discriminative Features with Multiple Granularities for Person Re-Identificationcited by 290
  8. 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
  9. 2018Additive Margin Softmax for Face Verificationcited by 275
  10. 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
  11. 2020Self-paced Contrastive Learning with Hybrid Memory for Domain Adaptive Object Re-IDcited by 212
  12. 2020Proxy Anchor Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 195
  13. 2019Learning with Average Precision: Training Image Retrieval with a Listwise Losscited by 184
  14. 2019SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet Samplingcited by 163
  15. 2019Cross-Batch Memory for Embedding Learningcited by 130
  16. 2018Deep Metric Learning with Hierarchical Triplet Losscited by 112
  17. 2020ProxyNCA++: Revisiting and Revitalizing Proxy Neighborhood Component Analysiscited by 107
  18. 2020A unifying mutual information view of metric learning: cross-entropy vs. pairwise lossescited by 100
  19. 2020Revisiting Training Strategies and Generalization Performance in Deep Metric Learningcited by 99
  20. 2020Smooth-AP: Smoothing the Path Towards Large-Scale Image Retrievalcited by 98
  21. 2017Smart Mining for Deep Metric Learningcited by 96
  22. 2021Cluster Contrast for Unsupervised Person Re-Identificationcited by 89
  23. 2020Hard negative examples are hard, but usefulcited by 82
  24. 2019Ranked List Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 77
  25. 2019Optimizing Rank-based Metrics with Blackbox Differentiationcited by 58
  26. 2016Learning Deep Embeddings with Histogram Losscited by 52
  27. 2021Recall@k Surrogate Loss with Large Batches and Similarity Mixupcited by 49
  28. 2016Hard-Aware Deeply Cascaded Embeddingcited by 44
  29. 2020Fewer is More: A Deep Graph Metric Learning Perspective Using Fewer Proxiescited by 36
  30. 2019Metric Learning With HORDE: High-Order Regularizer for Deep Embeddingscited by 29
  31. 2019SoDeep: a Sorting Deep net to learn ranking loss surrogatescited by 28
  32. 2021Noise-resistant Deep Metric Learning with Ranking-based Instance Selectioncited by 23
  33. 2021It Takes Two to Tango: Mixup for Deep Metric Learningcited by 23
  34. 2021Robust and Decomposable Average Precision for Image Retrievalcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.