Robust Positive-Unlabeled Learning via Noise Negative Sample Self-correction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning from positive and unlabeled data is known as positive-unlabeled (PU) learning in literature and has attracted much attention in recent years. One common approach in PU learning is to sample a set of pseudo-negatives from the unlabeled data using ad-hoc thresholds so that conventional supervised methods can be applied with both positive and negative samples. Owing to the label uncertainty among the unlabeled data, errors of misclassifying unlabeled positive samples as negative samples inevitably appear and may even accumulate during the training processes. Those errors often lead to performance degradation and model instability. To mitigate the impact of label uncertainty and improve the robustness of learning with positive and unlabeled data, we propose a new robust PU learning method with a training strategy motivated by the nature of human learning: easy cases should be learned first. Similar intuition has been utilized in curriculum learning to only use easier cases in the early stage of training before introducing more complex cases. Specifically, we utilize a novel ``hardness'' measure to distinguish unlabeled samples with a high chance of being negative from unlabeled samples with large label noise. An iterative training strategy is then implemented to fine-tune the selection of negative samples during the training process in an iterative manner to include more ``easy'' samples in the early stage of training. Extensive experimental validations over a wide range of learning tasks show that this approach can effectively improve the accuracy and stability of learning with positive and unlabeled data. Our code is available at https://github.com/woriazzc/Robust-PU
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.
Builds on
13 of 35 references.
References · 13
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
- 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 202
- 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
- 2019Dynamic Curriculum Learning for Imbalanced Data Classificationcited by 93
- 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
- 2016Class-prior Estimation for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 46
- 2022Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspectivecited by 38
- 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
- 2019Reinforcement Learning based Curriculum Optimization for Neural Machine Translationcited by 29
- 2016Self-Paced Learning: an Implicit Regularization Perspectivecited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Noise-Resilient Point-wise Anomaly Detection in Time Series Using Weak Segment Labelscited by 3
- 2025Accessible, Realistic, and Fair Evaluation of Positive-Unlabeled Learning Algorithmscited by 1
- 2024ESA: Example Sieve Approach for Multi-Positive and Unlabeled Learningcited by 0
- 2025Detecting Scarce and Sparse Anomalous: Solving Dual Imbalance in Multi-Instance Learningcited by 0
- 2026Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Agent Safety False Alarm Auditingcited by 0
- 2026Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Agent Safety False Alarm Auditing2 Oct 2026
- 2025Accessible, Realistic, and Fair Evaluation of Positive-Unlabeled Learning Algorithms29 Sep 2025
- 2025Detecting Scarce and Sparse Anomalous: Solving Dual Imbalance in Multi-Instance Learning17 Mar 2025
- 2025Noise-Resilient Point-wise Anomaly Detection in Time Series Using Weak Segment Labels21 Jan 2025
- 2024ESA: Example Sieve Approach for Multi-Positive and Unlabeled Learning3 Dec 2024