mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Impact of Loss Functions and Scene Representations for 3D/2D Registration on Single-view Fluoroscopic X-ray Pose Estimation

arXiv 2308.00214 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many tasks performed in image-guided procedures can be cast as pose estimation problems, where specific projections are chosen to reach a target in 3D space. In this study, we first develop a differentiable projection (DiffProj) rendering framework for the efficient computation of Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) with automatic differentiability from either Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) or neural scene representations, including two newly proposed methods, Neural Tuned Tomography (NeTT) and masked Neural Radiance Fields (mNeRF). We then perform pose estimation by iterative gradient descent using various candidate loss functions, that quantify the image discrepancy of the synthesized DRR with respect to the ground-truth fluoroscopic X-ray image. Compared to alternative loss functions, the Mutual Information loss function can significantly improve pose estimation accuracy, as it can effectively prevent entrapment in local optima. Using the Mutual Information loss, a comprehensive evaluation of pose estimation performed on a tomographic X-ray dataset of 50 patients' skulls shows that utilizing either discretized (CBCT) or neural (NeTT/mNeRF) scene representations in DiffProj leads to comparable performance in DRR appearance and pose estimation (3D angle errors: mean ≤ 3.2deg and 90% quantile ≤ 3.4deg), despite the latter often incurring considerable training expenses and time. These findings could be instrumental for selecting appropriate approaches to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of fluoroscopic X-ray pose estimation in widespread image-guided interventions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.

Builds on

15 of 36 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  2. 2020pixelNeRF: Neural Radiance Fields from One or Few Imagescited by 1,574
  3. 2020NeRF in the Wild: Neural Radiance Fields for Unconstrained Photo Collectionscited by 1,230
  4. 2020INeRF: Inverting Neural Radiance Fields for Pose Estimationcited by 381
  5. 2022MAXIM: Multi-Axis MLP for Image Processingcited by 301
  6. 2022MedNeRF: Medical Neural Radiance Fields for Reconstructing 3D-aware CT-Projections from a Single X-raycited by 66
  7. 2019Anatomical Priors in Convolutional Networks for Unsupervised Biomedical Segmentationcited by 40
  8. 2019Automatic Annotation of Hip Anatomy in Fluoroscopy for Robust and Efficient 2D/3D Registrationcited by 29
  9. 2020End-To-End Convolutional Neural Network for 3D Reconstruction of Knee Bones From Bi-Planar X-Ray Imagescited by 28
  10. 2021The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspectivecited by 22
  11. 2020Generalizing Spatial Transformers to Projective Geometry with Applications to 2D/3D Registrationcited by 21
  12. 2019Multiview 2D/3D Rigid Registration via a Point-Of-Interest Network for Tracking and Triangulation (POINT2)cited by 18
3 more
  1. 2015Real-time 2D/3D Registration via CNN Regressioncited by 15
  2. 2016X-ray In-Depth Decomposition: Revealing The Latent Structurescited by 6
  3. 2021Transfer Learning from an Artificial Radiograph-landmark Dataset for Registration of the Anatomic Skull Model to Dual Fluoroscopic X-ray Imagescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.