Pretrained deep models outperform GBDTs in Learning-To-Rank under label scarcity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
On tabular data, a significant body of literature has shown that current deep learning (DL) models perform at best similarly to Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), while significantly underperforming them on outlier data. However, these works often study idealized problem settings which may fail to capture complexities of real-world scenarios. We identify a natural tabular data setting where DL models can outperform GBDTs: tabular Learning-to-Rank (LTR) under label scarcity. Tabular LTR applications, including search and recommendation, often have an abundance of unlabeled data, and scarce labeled data. We show that DL rankers can utilize unsupervised pretraining to exploit this unlabeled data. In extensive experiments over both public and proprietary datasets, we show that pretrained DL rankers consistently outperform GBDT rankers on ranking metrics -- sometimes by as much as 38% -- both overall and on outliers.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 91 of its 150 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2023.
Builds on
91 of 150 references.
References · 91
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
38 more
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
- 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 747
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 676
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
- 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
- 2019Deep Learning Recommendation Model for Personalization and Recommendation Systemscited by 327
- 2020DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systemscited by 327
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 319
- 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
- 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
- 2018xDeepFM: Combining Explicit and Implicit Feature Interactions for Recommender Systemscited by 278
- 2022TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Modelscited by 277
- 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 267
- 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 256
- 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 223
- 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 203
- 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 201
- 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 156
- 2021Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasetscited by 151
- 2016Product-based Neural Networks for User Response Predictioncited by 145
- 2022TransTab: Learning Transferable Tabular Transformers Across Tablescited by 132
- 2017Improving Generalization Performance by Switching from Adam to SGDcited by 125
- 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 121
50 most cited of 91 All 91 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025RewardRank: Optimizing True Learning-to-Rank Utilitycited by 0
- 2025RewardRank: Optimizing True Learning-to-Rank Utility19 Aug 2025