mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Electric Vehicle Balancing of Autonomous Mobility-On-Demand System: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach

arXiv 2307.16228 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2023cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Electric autonomous vehicles (EAVs) are getting attention in future autonomous mobility-on-demand (AMoD) systems due to their economic and societal benefits. However, EAVs' unique charging patterns (long charging time, high charging frequency, unpredictable charging behaviors, etc.) make it challenging to accurately predict the EAVs supply in E-AMoD systems. Furthermore, the mobility demand's prediction uncertainty makes it an urgent and challenging task to design an integrated vehicle balancing solution under supply and demand uncertainties. Despite the success of reinforcement learning-based E-AMoD balancing algorithms, state uncertainties under the EV supply or mobility demand remain unexplored. In this work, we design a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)-based framework for EAVs balancing in E-AMoD systems, with adversarial agents to model both the EAVs supply and mobility demand uncertainties that may undermine the vehicle balancing solutions. We then propose a robust E-AMoD Balancing MARL (REBAMA) algorithm to train a robust EAVs balancing policy to balance both the supply-demand ratio and charging utilization rate across the whole city. Experiments show that our proposed robust method performs better compared with a non-robust MARL method that does not consider state uncertainties; it improves the reward, charging utilization fairness, and supply-demand fairness by 19.28%, 28.18%, and 3.97%, respectively. Compared with a robust optimization-based method, the proposed MARL algorithm can improve the reward, charging utilization fairness, and supply-demand fairness by 8.21%, 8.29%, and 9.42%, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2023.

Builds on

15 of 40 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  2. 2017Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attackscited by 152
  3. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Driver Vehicle Dispatching and Repositioning Problemcited by 29
  4. 2021Graph Neural Network Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systemscited by 27
  5. 2017Data-Driven Model Predictive Control of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systemscited by 23
  6. 2022What is the Solution for State-Adversarial Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning?cited by 21
  7. 2015Model Predictive Control of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systemscited by 9
  8. 2018Experience: Understanding Long-Term Evolving Patterns of Shared Electric Vehicle Networkscited by 8
  9. 2022Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Electric Vehicle Balancing for Mobility-on-Demand Systems under Demand and Supply Uncertaintiescited by 8
  10. 2016Data-Driven Robust Taxi Dispatch under Demand Uncertaintiescited by 7
  11. 2022Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Electric Vehicle Balancing for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems under Demand and Supply Uncertaintiescited by 6
  12. 2016Predictive Positioning and Quality Of Service Ridesharing for Campus Mobility On Demand Systemscited by 5
3 more
  1. 2013Dynamic vehicle redistribution and online price incentives in shared mobility systemscited by 4
  2. 2016A BCMP Network Approach to Modeling and Controlling Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systemscited by 3
  3. 2017On the interaction between Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand systems and the power network: models and coordination algorithmscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.