Shuffled Differentially Private Federated Learning for Time Series Data Analytics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trustworthy federated learning aims to achieve optimal performance while ensuring clients' privacy. Existing privacy-preserving federated learning approaches are mostly tailored for image data, lacking applications for time series data, which have many important applications, like machine health monitoring, human activity recognition, etc. Furthermore, protective noising on a time series data analytics model can significantly interfere with temporal-dependent learning, leading to a greater decline in accuracy. To address these issues, we develop a privacy-preserving federated learning algorithm for time series data. Specifically, we employ local differential privacy to extend the privacy protection trust boundary to the clients. We also incorporate shuffle techniques to achieve a privacy amplification, mitigating the accuracy decline caused by leveraging local differential privacy. Extensive experiments were conducted on five time series datasets. The evaluation results reveal that our algorithm experienced minimal accuracy loss compared to non-private federated learning in both small and large client scenarios. Under the same level of privacy protection, our algorithm demonstrated improved accuracy compared to the centralized differentially private federated learning in both scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2023.
Builds on
14 of 29 references.
References · 14
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2021Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrastingcited by 342
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 103
- 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 73
- 2019Collecting and Analyzing Multidimensional Data with Local Differential Privacycited by 46
- 2013Local Privacy, Data Processing Inequalities, and Statistical Minimax Ratescited by 26
- 2021On the Renyi Differential Privacy of the Shuffle Modelcited by 16
- 2020Shuffled Model of Federated Learning: Privacy, Communication and Accuracy Trade-offscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Federated Gaussian Mixture Modelscited by 2
- 2025Federated Gaussian Mixture Models2 Jun 2025