mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Writer adaptation for offline text recognition: An exploration of neural network-based methods

arXiv 2307.15071 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2023cs.CV cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Handwriting recognition has seen significant success with the use of deep learning. However, a persistent shortcoming of neural networks is that they are not well-equipped to deal with shifting data distributions. In the field of handwritten text recognition (HTR), this shows itself in poor recognition accuracy for writers that are not similar to those seen during training. An ideal HTR model should be adaptive to new writing styles in order to handle the vast amount of possible writing styles. In this paper, we explore how HTR models can be made writer adaptive by using only a handful of examples from a new writer (e.g., 16 examples) for adaptation. Two HTR architectures are used as base models, using a ResNet backbone along with either an LSTM or Transformer sequence decoder. Using these base models, two methods are considered to make them writer adaptive: 1) model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML), an algorithm commonly used for tasks such as few-shot classification, and 2) writer codes, an idea originating from automatic speech recognition. Results show that an HTR-specific version of MAML known as MetaHTR improves performance compared to the baseline with a 1.4 to 2.0 improvement in word error rate (WER). The improvement due to writer adaptation is between 0.2 and 0.7 WER, where a deeper model seems to lend itself better to adaptation using MetaHTR than a shallower model. However, applying MetaHTR to larger HTR models or sentence-level HTR may become prohibitive due to its high computational and memory requirements. Lastly, writer codes based on learned features or Hinge statistical features did not lead to improved recognition performance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2023.

Builds on

42 of 70 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  5. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  6. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  7. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  8. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  9. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  10. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  11. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  12. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
30 more
  1. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  2. 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,423
  3. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
  4. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  5. 2015An End-to-End Trainable Neural Network for Image-based Sequence Recognition and Its Application to Scene Text Recognitioncited by 519
  6. 2018Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimizationcited by 476
  7. 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 377
  8. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  9. 2016A Learned Representation For Artistic Stylecited by 340
  10. 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 306
  11. 2021TrOCR: Transformer-based Optical Character Recognition with Pre-trained Modelscited by 278
  12. 2017Modulating early visual processing by languagecited by 167
  13. 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 154
  14. 2018Show, Attend and Read: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Irregular Text Recognitioncited by 130
  15. 2020learn2learn: A Library for Meta-Learning Researchcited by 69
  16. 2019Meta-Learning via Learned Losscited by 60
  17. 2019Evaluating Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Handwritten Text Recognitioncited by 58
  18. 2021Rethinking Text Line Recognition Modelscited by 45
  19. 2019Learning to Forget for Meta-Learningcited by 35
  20. 2020Learning Fast Adaptation on Cross-Accented Speech Recognitioncited by 28
  21. 2021MetaHTR: Towards Writer-Adaptive Handwritten Text Recognitioncited by 27
  22. 2021Full Page Handwriting Recognition via Image to Sequence Extractioncited by 24
  23. 2020FragNet: Writer Identification using Deep Fragment Networkscited by 18
  24. 2016Online and Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognition: A Comprehensive Study and New Benchmarkcited by 17
  25. 2015DeepWriterID: An End-to-end Online Text-independent Writer Identification Systemcited by 14
  26. 2018Writer-Aware CNN for Parsimonious HMM-Based Offline Handwritten Chinese Text Recognitioncited by 10
  27. 2021DiverGAN: An Efficient and Effective Single-Stage Framework for Diverse Text-to-Image Generationcited by 7
  28. 2018Learning to adapt: a meta-learning approach for speaker adaptationcited by 6
  29. 2019BiNet: Degraded-Manuscript Binarization in Diverse Document Textures and Layouts using Deep Encoder-Decoder Networkscited by 5
  30. 2019A limited-size ensemble of homogeneous CNN/LSTMs for high-performance word classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.