mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Test Time Adaptation for Blind Image Quality Assessment

arXiv 2307.14735 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2023cs.CV eess.IVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While the design of blind image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms has improved significantly, the distribution shift between the training and testing scenarios often leads to a poor performance of these methods at inference time. This motivates the study of test time adaptation (TTA) techniques to improve their performance at inference time. Existing auxiliary tasks and loss functions used for TTA may not be relevant for quality-aware adaptation of the pre-trained model. In this work, we introduce two novel quality-relevant auxiliary tasks at the batch and sample levels to enable TTA for blind IQA. In particular, we introduce a group contrastive loss at the batch level and a relative rank loss at the sample level to make the model quality aware and adapt to the target data. Our experiments reveal that even using a small batch of images from the test distribution helps achieve significant improvement in performance by updating the batch normalization statistics of the source model.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2023.

Builds on

25 of 47 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  5. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,062
  6. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  7. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,020
  8. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  9. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  10. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
  11. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
  12. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
13 more
  1. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
  2. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  3. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
  4. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
  5. 2020PIPAL: a Large-Scale Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Perceptual Image Restorationcited by 177
  6. 2017Colorization as a Proxy Task for Visual Understandingcited by 175
  7. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
  8. 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 150
  9. 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
  10. 2017Unsupervised Learning by Predicting Noisecited by 97
  11. 2021Test-Time Adaptation to Distribution Shift by Confidence Maximization and Input Transformationcited by 67
  12. 2022Robustifying Vision Transformer without Retraining from Scratch by Test-Time Class-Conditional Feature Alignmentcited by 26
  13. 2022Quality Assessment of Low Light Restored Images: A Subjective Study and an Unsupervised Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

11 papers.