Is GPT a Computational Model of Emotion? Detailed Analysis
On the map: LLM reasoning → Audio-language model reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the emotional reasoning abilities of the GPT family of large language models via a component perspective. The paper first examines how the model reasons about autobiographical memories. Second, it systematically varies aspects of situations to impact emotion intensity and coping tendencies. Even without the use of prompt engineering, it is shown that GPT's predictions align significantly with human-provided appraisals and emotional labels. However, GPT faces difficulties predicting emotion intensity and coping responses. GPT-4 showed the highest performance in the initial study but fell short in the second, despite providing superior results after minor prompt engineering. This assessment brings up questions on how to effectively employ the strong points and address the weak areas of these models, particularly concerning response variability. These studies underscore the merits of evaluating models from a componential perspective.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Audio-language model reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 3 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2023.
Builds on
3 of 8 references.
References · 3
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389
- 2023Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Taskscited by 288
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systemscited by 125
- 2023Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBenchcited by 54
- 2023Who is ChatGPT? Benchmarking LLMs' Psychological Portrayal Using PsychoBenchcited by 28
- 2024GPT-4 Emulates Average-Human Emotional Cognition from a Third-Person Perspectivecited by 16
- 2024Towards a Psychology of Machines: Large Language Models Predict Human Memorycited by 4
- 2025Assessing the Reliability and Validity of GPT-4 in Annotating Emotion Appraisal Ratingscited by 0
- 2025Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems31 Mar 2025
- 2025Assessing the Reliability and Validity of GPT-4 in Annotating Emotion Appraisal Ratings21 Mar 2025
- 2024GPT-4 Emulates Average-Human Emotional Cognition from a Third-Person Perspective11 Aug 2024
- 2024Towards a Psychology of Machines: Large Language Models Predict Human Memory8 Mar 2024
- 2023Who is ChatGPT? Benchmarking LLMs' Psychological Portrayal Using PsychoBench2 Oct 2023
- 2023Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench7 Aug 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Mind meets machine: Unravelling GPT-4's cognitive psychology
- 2025Large language models show fragile cognitive reasoning about human emotions
- 2025Large Language Models are Highly Aligned with Human Ratings of Emotional Stimuli
- 2025Beyond Context to Cognitive Appraisal: Emotion Reasoning as a Theory of Mind Benchmark for Large Language Models
- 2024GPT as Psychologist? Preliminary Evaluations for GPT-4V on Visual Affective Computing
- 2024Rethinking Emotion Annotations in the Era of Large Language Models
- 2025The Personalization Trap: How User Memory Alters Emotional Reasoning in LLMs
- 2024Affective Computing in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey from the NLP Perspective